Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 22 of 40 Attachment C <br />From: claudia sarconi <claudiasarconi@hotmail.com> <br />Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:15 AM <br />To: GRP -City Council <council@redwoodcity.org> <br />Subject: District Maps <br />Dear Council Members, <br />I am writing to share my thoughts on the District Election maps. As a resident of Redwood <br />Shores for over 18 years, I feel strongly that we need to have someone who lives in Redwood <br />Shores represent us. It is important for the council member to live in Redwood Shores so that <br />he or she understands the issues. He or she would undoubtedly take a much stronger interest <br />in the issues if they affect his or her community. In addition, Redwood Shores is not contiguous <br />with Bair Island or any other area of Redwood City. The population of Redwood Shores is <br />already at the "ideal" limit per the map options. Bair Island is a new development. I am guessing <br />the population will grow in the coming years. If that is the case, the district's population would <br />be more than the other districts if it were to be merged with Redwood Shores. <br />For this reason, I do not support map option 13G. <br />Personally, I would be happy with any of the other options because they do not combine <br />Redwood Shores with another part of Redwood City. None of the other options are perfect, but <br />21E seems like the most balanced option to me in terms of the population, income level and <br />housing stats. <br />Sincerely, <br />Claudia Sarconi <br />256 <br />