My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-09-11
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-09-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2013 11:42:35 AM
Creation date
9/7/2006 3:30:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
9/11/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9A <br /> L�G t�J'RAPS UP� fram page 11 . . . . , ` , . TELECaM from page 1 a p . m » . . . m . . Page 12 <br /> graffiti management and removal. The bill aiso Passage of the measure occurred days <br /> expands Meflo-Roos districts ta inciude programs fiollowing an August 28 San Francisco Chronicle <br /> ta create incentives or to subsidize constructian, article which reported that during April, May and <br /> rehabilitation or acquisition of housing for lower June of this year, telephone companies reported <br /> income households. Staff: Dan Carrigg; Status: spending nearly$20 million trying to secure <br /> Governor's Desk; Position: Support. passage ofAB 2987. The bill continued to be <br /> lobbied intensively, right up to its passage by the <br /> AB 1602(Laird).As part af the 2004-2005 AssembEy on the final night of fhe sessian. <br /> budget agreement, a Vehicle License Fee{VLF)— <br /> Praperty Tax swap was enacted. During the Some Key lmprovements Achieved <br /> discussions on this proposal, it was recognized <br /> that there w�re some outstanding issues tha# While the League and California cities support <br /> could not be resolved by the compietion of the competition in video and teiecommunications <br /> budget. BA 1602(Laird} is designed to resolve services, we have consistently opposed AB 2987 <br /> some of those issues.AB 1602 addresses fhe because of concerns that the measure facks <br /> immediate fiscal inequities that occurred for sufficient protections for communities. Together <br /> communities that were in the process of incorpo- with California cities and consumer and commu- <br /> rating or annexing at the time the law changed. nity groups, we worked iong and hard to educate <br /> Staff: Dan Carrigg; St.atus: Governor's Desk; fegislators about our concerns, and ultimately did <br /> Position: Support. achieve improvements in the bill. <br /> SB 1374 (Cedillo}. This measure will extend These include protecting local control over <br /> the sunset date of 2008 on existing law that allows rights-of-way; ensuring that local agencies will <br /> cities to continue in their tax discovery efforts by receive franchise fees tataling five percent o#a <br /> allowing the Franchise Tax Board (FTB}to share provider's gross revenues; requiring build-out to <br /> taxpayer information. The State and Local Govern- any low income areas contained in a service <br /> ment Tax Sharing Program has helped many cities provider's franchise area; and increased protec- <br /> to identify businesses that are not paying local tion for existing PEG and I-Net services. (See <br /> taxes—resulting in millions of dollars recauped. alsa"AB 2987: PEG/l-NetAmendments.") <br /> 4ver 95 citias are currently participa#ing in the <br /> program. 1 74 wiii extend the program untif VVe remain opposed to the bifl, however, and <br /> Decernber 31, 2011. Staff: Dan Carrigg; Status: will ask for a VETO from the Governor. Our <br /> Governor's Desk; Position: Support. concerns continue to be those identified in our <br /> legislative FloorAfert{distributed last week to all <br /> SB 1317 (Torlakson). This measure would cities). These are the issues that we wiil ask <br /> a(locate new property tax revenue related to newly Gov. Schwarzenegger to consider when he <br /> constructed generation, substation facilities and receives the bill. They include ongoing concerns <br /> transmission iines by a lacation-based method. about providers' abifity to "cherry-pick" customers; <br /> 1 1 would not change the allocation of prop- customer service enforcement questions; the <br /> erty taxes for existing electric generation and ability of cable companies to unilaterally abrogate <br /> transmission line facilities. The �eague has local franchise agreements; the future ability of <br /> standing policy that supports direct, or situs-based communities to establish PEG and I-Net services; <br /> allocation of sales and property taxes based on the and creation of a new state bureaucracy. <br /> fact that situs-based allocation targets revenues #o <br /> where the impact occurs. Staff: Dan Carrigg; We also have many practical questions abouf <br /> Status: Governor's Desk; Position: Support. how implementation will occur, particularly given <br /> that more than 300 amendments were taken in <br /> the final week of session—amendmenfs which <br /> Coniinued on Page 13 <br /> PAGE 12 • PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Website--www.caci#ies,org <br /> September 1, 2006 - Issue#3S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.