My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2002-09-09 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CC Min 2002-09-09 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:36:57 PM
Creation date
10/18/2002 11:35:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Principal Planner Passanisi began to address the Specific Shores Bayfront EIR <br /> appeal and the changes recommended by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> Council Members asked various questions. <br /> <br /> Mayor Claire opened the public hearing. <br /> <br /> Appellant- Mary Morrissey Parden, representing the Redwood Shores Owners <br /> Association (RSOA), stated that prior to stating the basis for the appeal, she <br /> would like to be on record to object to the agenda which as published does not <br /> allow comment on the appeal. She stated that the Brown Act, Government Code <br /> Section 54954.2, specifically states, "No action shall be taken on any item not <br /> agendized". <br /> <br /> City Attorney Yamamoto stated that in his opinion, the agendized item is <br /> appropriate. Under the Code section named, specifically, provided is that the <br /> Legislative body shall have on its published agenda, a brief general description of <br /> less than 20 words explaining what the item is. He further stated that all the <br /> essential elements that have been raised with respect to the Specific Plan and <br /> EIR are encompassed within the brief, general description on the published <br /> agenda. He stated that it does meet the intent of the State statute and does <br /> encompass all of the elements for action by the City Council. <br /> <br /> Ms. Parden began addressing the appeal by category: <br /> · FACC parking issue - various organizations and residents publicly <br /> expressed concern at the Planning Commission meeting that FACC does <br /> not have enough room on the property to comply with standard zoning <br /> ordinances. Almost all of the 284 parking spaces determined by the EIR to <br /> be the minimum can only be accommodated by using parking spaces of <br /> other adjacent commercial properties. Neither the Specific Plan nor <br /> existing zoning ordinances require FACC to obtain permanent legal rights <br /> for shared parking. <br /> · SBSA changes to the plan - FACC and SBSA will have entitlements given <br /> to them by the plan if approved by the Council without any of the new <br /> wetland restoration, landscaping or trails that are shown in the originally <br /> proposed draft Specific Plan. <br /> · Planned trees eliminated by the plan - a compromise can be reached that <br /> maintains at least some of the trees or changes to the species or size of <br /> the trees in addition to the hedge. <br /> · Public input omitted from the EIR - most of the Gossamer neighborhoods <br /> do not approve of the acceptance of the Redwood Shores Bayfront <br /> Specific Plan. <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 9, 2002 <br />MINUTES PAGE 9 <br /> MINUTES Book No. 59 <br /> Page No. 257 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.