My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2002-09-23 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CC Min 2002-09-23 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:34:14 PM
Creation date
10/18/2002 11:37:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/23/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
encompasses, hairdressers, estheticians and nail people are independent <br /> businesspeople and the products they buy are for their own personal use. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cochran stated that Redwood City is seen as a center point in the target for <br /> the Peninsula, the business has signed a five year lease, a business license and <br /> building permit have been received, a sign permit has been delayed, $50,000.00 <br /> has been spent in construction costs to improve the store appearance and <br /> opening of the store is expected in three weeks. He stated that the call stating that <br /> the business was an improper use was initiated by West Coast Beauty Supply. He <br /> further stated that under the code, his business is a retail store and meets the <br /> requirements. <br /> <br /> David Blackwell requested that the Council incorporate into the administrative <br /> record, the letter that was offered by R.J. Comer of the Los Angeles office <br /> transmitted sometime by fax and thought to be prior to 3:00 p.m. that day. He <br /> asked that the points in the letter be considered in the Council deliberations and <br /> that he could touch on the topics if needed. <br /> <br /> Recess: 9:25-9:40 p.m. <br /> <br /> Council questions ensued of both the appellant and staff. <br /> <br /> Public Comment <br /> <br /> Steve Penna stated that his reason for speaking is that finally in that area, the <br /> building is going to be used for something that will bring more people to downtown <br /> Redwood City. He stated, that in his opinion Innovations has been treated unfairly <br /> because the codes and the description of retail is not clear enough and that the <br /> item would not be appealed if it were not for a complaint by another business. He <br /> further stated that there are many businesses on the 2600 block that cannot be <br /> considered retail, but they will be hiring people and creating foot traffic. <br /> <br /> John Tobias stated that his customers are hairdressers and his business can <br /> draw between 2,500-3,000 hairdressers in the basic market. <br /> <br /> Steve Cutter stated that Innovations qualified under every section of the code and <br /> that the interpretation is becoming very frustrating. <br /> <br /> John Anagnostou shared a solution that might help in the case and has been <br /> used by the Downtown Association in the past. That method would be utilization <br /> of a use permit. He further stated that notification to property owners of the CBR <br /> district would be helpful. <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 23, 2002 <br />MINUTES PAGE 7 <br /> MINUTES Book No. 59 <br /> Page No. 271 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.