My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-12-04
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-12-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2014 10:20:08 AM
Creation date
11/30/2006 4:10:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
12/4/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8A <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />single-family detached, town homes, and traditional multi-family apartments and <br />condominiums. Examples of additional types of housing that are appropriate to <br />changing demographics and responsive to today's market include row housing, high <br />rise, live/work spaces, and industrial lofts. <br /> <br />Another question for the Downtown Precise Plan area is: Should fewer than five <br />condominiums (per current code) be allowed to be built in order to encourage <br />residential development of small lots? <br /> <br />Rezoning and Reuse <br />Another program that some cities are implementing is rezoning under-utilized <br />industrial or commercial sites to residential. This helps reduce the jobs/housing <br />imbalance both by increasing residential and by minimizing future job growth. <br />Redwood City is considering this approach in reviewing an application for a hlgh- <br />density residential project at 333 Main Street which is currently zoned "IP-V" <br />(Industrial Park-Vehicular combining district). <br /> <br />An additional approach is to add residential to under-utilized portions of existing <br />developments. For example, office complexes that have large areas of surface <br />parking. It may become cost-effective to put some of that parking into structures and <br />to make some of the surface lot area available for construction of new higher density <br />housing. Mixing residential on such sites could make joint use of some of the <br />parking (office use during the day and residential use during nights and weekends) <br />and the residential traffic would flow the opposite direction from the office traffic, thus <br />making more effective use of the lane capacity. Adding residential units might also <br />support local-serving retail at these locations, with the potential to reduce vehicle <br />trips even more. <br /> <br />Accessory Dwelling Units <br />A convenient - but sometimes controversial - way to add housing to an existing <br />neighborhood is through adding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) to existing single- <br />family homes. This can provide needed housing for students, elderly and others <br />who need only a small, but self-contained living space. Many cities, including <br />Redwood City, permit such units, but to mitigate neighborhood impacts, impose <br />various requirements on the creation of such units. One key provision that may <br />discourage ADUs is the parking requirement. Redwood City Zoning Code Section <br />37.2J, for example, requires a total of three off-street parking places for the main <br />dwelling unit and the ADU. Eliminating the parking requirement and accepting that <br />an ADU resident may park on the public street could help in achieving more units. <br /> <br />Staff acknowledges that the Council has considered this issue twice in the past eight <br />years and turned it down. However, if increasing the supply of affordable housing is <br />viewed as a City obligation, not just a Redevelopment Agency obligation, this option <br />could be reconsidered. <br /> <br />2. Inclusionary Housing Policies <br />Some cities have "inclusionary housing" pOlicies that require, for example, that all <br />new housing projects include a percentage (say 15%) of "affordable" housing units. <br /> <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.