My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res89 11191
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
1980-1989 partial
>
1989
>
Res89 11191
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2008 9:16:39 AM
Creation date
12/5/2006 2:40:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
12/4/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1" <br /> <br />~~w4 tf.'15, M, <br />/1/;1-1/64 <br />LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY <br /> <br />'- c 17 E I( t1I'o. ~ <br /> <br />298 FULLER STREET <br /> <br />PEfER H. REID <br />EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR <br /> <br />REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA 94063 <br /> <br />rn <br /> <br /> <br />TELEPHONE (415) 365-8411 <br /> <br />w m <br /> <br />00 <br /> <br />November 21, 1989 <br /> <br />writer's Direct Line: <br /> <br />363-4386 <br /> <br />td 2 IIJB9 <br /> <br /> <br />HAND DELIYEREQ <br /> <br />Mayor Jack Grenalch <br />city of Redwood City <br />1017 Middlefield Road <br />Redwood city, CA 94063 <br /> <br />Re: Objections to the Final Environmental Impact Report <br />for the Proposed Second Amendment to the Redwood <br />city Redevelopment Project No. 2 And To The <br />Second Amendment. <br /> <br />Dear Mayor/Chairman Grenalch and Members <br />of the City council/Redevelopment Agency: <br /> <br />The following objections are submitted on behalf of Ms. <br />Mildred Martin and other Redwood city senior citizens and <br />families with low and moderate incomes who desperately need <br />affordable housing. <br /> <br />1. The FEIR should not be certified and should Q~ <br />circulated for further public comment. <br /> <br />The FEIR contains substantial changes to correct <br />inaccuracies and inadequacies in the draft EIR. They include for <br />example, recognition that the draft was inconsistent regarding <br />the significance of the land use succession impact, recognition <br />and substantially expanded discussion of three controversial <br />impacts (schools, affordable housing, and jobs/housing im- <br />balance), and proposed additional mitigation related to housing. <br />In addition, the proposed housing mitigation is vague, specula- <br />tive, and dependent upon future city action. It is premature to <br />certify the EIR as final and complete until these measures are <br />fleshed out and it is recirculated, so that the public can learn <br />of, digest, and comment upon the new information. <br /> <br />2. The Project Area Is Not Blighted and Is Not <br />Predominated bv Social and Economic Ills. <br /> <br />A prerequisite to adopting a Second Amendment is a finding <br />of blight, Health and Safety Code ~33030, ~33367, which must <br />satisfy a two-pronged test: (l) the area must constitute a <br />serious social or economic burden on the community, which cannot <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />11191 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.