My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res89 11190
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
1980-1989 partial
>
1989
>
Res89 11190
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2008 9:16:32 AM
Creation date
12/5/2006 2:41:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
12/4/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CWM:djm ll/06/89 (098/#25) <br />CWM:djm ./29/89R <br /> <br />If remains are Native American the Coroner <br /> <br />has 24 hours to notify the Native American <br /> <br />Heritage Commission. <br /> <br />b. Any artifacts discovered during excavation <br /> <br />shall be handled by a qualified archaeologist <br /> <br />and turned over immediately to a government <br /> <br />agency, to insure that they will be made <br /> <br />available for public display. <br /> <br />3. Rationale and Facts Supporting Findings. There <br />is little likelihood that cultural resources will be <br /> <br />found in the Amendment Area but it is appropriate to <br /> <br />provide a mechanism for their proper disposition in <br /> <br />the event that a discovery should occur. The <br /> <br />mitigations outlined in the findings are appropriate <br /> <br />and acceptable to the Native American Heritage <br /> <br />Commission. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Mitigation <br /> <br />Monitoring <br /> <br />Responsibility. <br /> <br />Responsibility for mitigation monitoring shall be <br /> <br />with the Planning Commission, and the Redevelopment <br /> <br />Director, and handled on a project by project basis. <br /> <br />B. INFEASIBILITY OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />The following Alternatives to the project described in the <br /> <br />Final EIR, which would reduce or avoid significant environmental <br /> <br />impacts and which are not included as part of the project, are <br /> <br />infeasible for the following reasons: <br /> <br />1. The No Project Alternative. This Alternative <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />11190 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.