My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-03-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-03-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:51:51 PM
Creation date
3/22/2002 10:57:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/25/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Legislative Bill Action <br /> The following are summaries of just a few of the legislative bills that are currently being acted upon by the <br /> League of California Cities. The League encourages you to review the bills and contact the appropriate <br /> committees to demonstrate your support or opposition of issues that are important to your community. <br /> Your assistance is appreciated. <br /> <br />REVENUE AND TAXATION AB 2100 ($imitian); AB 1865 <br /> AB 81 (Migden). Property Taxation. State- (Canciamilla). ERAF Cap. These two measures <br />Assessed Property. Prior to energy deregulation, have re-emerged from last session and merit city <br />the Board of Equalization (BOE) had authority for support. Both would take an incremental ap- <br />assessing property taxes on power generation proach to capping the growth on property taxes <br />facilities with the property tax revenues distrib- shifted in the 1990%. Both bills have similar <br />uted through the county pool. The rationale for structures; they include delayed effective dates to <br />using this unitary method was that these facilities get the state past the current fiscal crisis. Had <br />were part of all the properties owned by the these bills been in effect in the last few years, <br />electric companies. With the implementation of cities would have recaptured some of the property <br />deregulation and sales of these generating plants tax growth of the recent past. AB 2100 and <br />to other parties, the BOE adopted Rule 905 1865 have trigger mechanisms that would allow <br />shifting property assessment and taxation to the the suspension of the cap if the state's reserves <br />counties. The shift resulted in property taxes drop below certain minimum levels. Lastly, the <br /> bills return the growth in increments over an <br />being allocated on a situs basis. The results were <br /> extended period, City officials will remember AB <br />that cities where plants were sited or proposed <br />would receive the property tax revenues associated 100 (Simitian) and AB 1076 (Canciamilla) from <br />with the plants. This transfer of authority raised last year. Staff: Dwight Stenbakken, Status: <br />two issues. First, some property tax assessments AsLG, Position: Support. <br />were tied up on legal battles as the owners of the <br />facilities challenged county assessments. Second, ADMINISTRATIVE <br />properties under county assessment authority were SB 994 (Morrow). Skateboard Parks. <br />now limited to assessment increases under Propo- <br />sition 13. With the increasing property value of Liability. SB 994 extends the sunset for the <br /> existing law that provides limited liability protec- <br />power plants and the need for additional plants <br />caused by the energy crisis, the BOE in October tion for public agencies for lawsuits resulting from <br />2001 voted to reassert its assessment authority, injuries at skateboard parks, Due to several city <br />This bill allows the BOE to retain assessment attorneys expressing a concern about whether or <br /> not to let the existing law sunset, the League <br />authority and requires the property tax revenues <br />to be distributed on a situs basis. Staff: Dwight asked interested city attorneys to review this bill. <br />Stenbakken, Status: SenApps; Hrg-3/11; Posi- A strong majority of city attorneys recommended <br />tion: Support. proceeding with SB 994 and suggested several <br /> different amendments to improve it. The League <br /> shared this information with the author, and <br /> sponsors of the bill, the City of Laguna Hills, and <br /> <br />IOur Mission <br /> Restore and protect local control for cities through education and advocacy to enhance the quality of life For all Ealifomlans. <br /> <br />PAGE 2/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site--www. cacities.org <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.