Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FEDERAL UPDATE from page 4 . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />position in the 110th Congress, and Congressman <br />John Doolittle (Granite Bay) is expected to remain <br />on the Committee. <br /> <br />Several Californians have also been selected <br />to serve on the Democratic Steering Committee, <br />including Representatives George Miller, who will <br />serve as the committee's policy co-chair, Hilda <br />Solis (EI Monte), who will serve as the <br />committee's vice chair, Loretta Sanchez (Garden <br />Grove), Mike Thompson (Napa), Dennis Cardoza <br />(Merced) and Doris Matsui (Sacramento). Incom- <br />ing Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC) has also <br />selected California Congresswoman Maxine <br />Waters (D-Los Angeles) to join his Whip opera- <br />tion. <br /> <br />Other Californians with new committee as- <br />signments include Representatives Jane Harman <br />(D-EI Segundo) and Grace NapoUtano {D-Santa <br />Fe Springs}. Congresswoman Harman will leave <br />her post as the ranking member on the House <br />Permanent Select Committee on I ntelligence to <br />join the Energy and Commerce Committee, and <br />Congresswoman Napolitano will become the chair <br />of the Resources Committee's Water and Power <br />Subcommittee and gain a seat on the Transporta- <br />tion and Infrastructure Committee. Current House <br />Administration Committee Ranking Member <br />Juanita Millender-McDonald (D- Torrance) is <br />expected to become the chair of the committee <br />when Congress reconvenes in January. <br /> <br />........................ <br /> <br />FCC from page 1 <br /> <br />FCC Commission Chairman Kevin J. Martin has <br />scheduled a vote at or before the FCC's December <br />20 meeting to adopt new rules governing local <br />cable franchising. <br /> <br />The League submitted comments to the notice <br />this past February, as did several national local <br />government organizations and various municipali- <br />ties nationwide. The FCC sought information about <br />whether the current local cable franchising process <br />.unreasonably impedes' the cable competition and <br />broadband deployment goals of the FCC, and if so, <br />what it should do to address the problem. <br /> <br />8A <br /> <br />A letter to the FCC from the U.S. Conference ~age 27 <br />Mayors, National Association of Counties, National <br />league of Cities, and National Association of <br />Telecommunications Officers and Advisors chal- <br />lenging the FCC's authority to pre-empt local video <br />(cable) franchising authority is available at <br />www.cacities erg/telecom. <br /> <br />The letter highlights the following key points: <br /> <br />· Title VI of the Communications Act does not <br />provide sufficient, if any, legal authority for the <br />commission to take action in changing the way <br />cable franchises are granted without explicit con- <br />gressional approval. The commission does not <br />have the authority to dictate the terms and condi- <br />tions of franchises given by local franchising <br />authorities. <br />· Title VI does not permit a fixed deadline on <br />local franchise authority action. A fixed deadline <br />would provide no incentive for new providers to <br />work toward a local franchise agreement because <br />they would have access to the public right of way <br />without local oversight If they simply wait out the <br />timeframes. <br />· The order would require the cost of any in- <br />kind benefits, such as I-Nets, as well as any mon- <br />etary payments other than the franchise fee, to be <br />offset against the 5 percent franchise fee. This <br />would be a significant net fiscal loss to the local <br />franchising authority. The "franchise fee" definition <br />in the Cable Act does not include in-kind services <br />or facilities, and it also does not include monetary <br />payments for PEG capital facilities and equipment <br />(including I-Net facilities} or monetary payments <br />incidental to the award or enforcement of the <br />franchise. <br />The "build-out" requirements in the draft <br />order do not protect the interests of all customers <br />in a local franchising area. Competition is good <br />when everyone can benefit, not just a privileged <br />few. Local franchising authorities have effectively <br />managed build-out in their respective jurisdictions <br />without hindering the deployment of broadband <br />services. <br /> <br />The League will continue to monitor the situa- <br />tion in Washington D.C. and will provide more <br />information as soon as it is available. <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Webslte-..www.caclties.org <br /> <br />PRIORITY FOCUS. PAGE 5 <br />December 15, 2006 . Issue #48 <br />