Laserfiche WebLink
· Existing First Step Project customers (dedicated landscape irrigation meters) <br /> <br /> · Customers with agreements In place for service <br /> <br /> · Potential customers or groups of customers that have relatively large irrigation or <br /> industrial demands, and are adjacent to potential transmission pipeline con'idors' <br /> <br /> · Potential customers or groups of customers that have small to medium-sized demands, <br /> and are adjacent to or relatively near potential transmission piPeline corridors <br /> <br /> Priority 3 Customers: <br /> <br /> · Potential customers or groups of customers with relatively small demands, that are <br /> either remote from potential transmission pipeline corridors, or may have higher <br /> customer site retrofit costs <br /> <br /> · Proposed future developments or re-development sites, or existing customer sites that <br /> are served by private walls or the California Water Service Company <br /> <br /> Priority 4 Customers: <br /> <br /> · Landscaped sites that are not presently irflgated or other uses that have very Iow <br /> demands <br /> <br /> · Sites that are very remote from potential transmission pipeline corridore, require <br /> significant additional pumping because of site elevation, or appear to have very <br /> challenging/expensive customer site retrofit costs <br /> <br />Priority I and 2 customers represent the most viable customers that are ready to be served, it <br />the City implements a mandatory use ordinance or obtains individual agreements for servica. <br />The annual recycled water demand from Priority '1 and 2 customers represents the most <br />reasonable minimum estimate of potential "new water supply' for integrated water supply <br />planning. Some portion of Priority 3 customer demands appear able to be cost-effectively <br />served, however, service in many cases is dependent upon establishing institutional <br />agreements to replace a current water supplier or future development or redevelopment <br />activities. Priority 4 customers do not appear viable for a number of reasons. Although they <br />were considered initially, their demands do not appear to be a source of 'new water supply' for <br />the City. <br /> <br />The potential recycled water demand for Priority 1, 2, and 3 customers in Redwood City <br />appears to range between about 1,100 and 3,172 acre feet per year (AF/yr), for a Redwood <br />Shores only project and a City-wide project, respectively. Within these projections, about 582 <br />AF/yr is for future developments or redevelopment projects that are in various stages of <br />planning. <br /> <br />Water Recycling Feasibility Study for Redwood Cfly v <br /> <br /> <br />