Laserfiche WebLink
Table ES-t: Recommended Project (Alternative D) Capital Cost Summan~ <br /> <br /> Item Description Cost <br /> I Storage and Standb7 Potable Connections $ 5~704~000 <br /> 2 Pumplr~l $ 1,320t000 <br /> 3 Transmission Pipeline $ 15r248~000 <br /> 4 Special Crossings by Jack end Bore $ <br /> 5 Treatment Facilities $ 1,636,000 <br /> Subtotal Facilltta~ $ 23~908~000 <br />6 I Service Connections end Retrofit (10% of Facllitios Cost) $ 2.391.000 <br />Subtotal Facllltle. & Connections $ 26t2991000 <br />Engineering, CM~ end Administration (20%) $ 5.260~000 <br />Conflr~enc~ {20%) $ 5;260~000 <br />TOTAL $ 36.8t9r000 <br />ES.5 Implementation Strategy <br /> <br />The basic implementation st=ategy for Altemative D water supply and capital impmvemeot <br />program is summarized in Table ES-2. The implementation concept is to simultaneously build <br />as treatment, pumping, storage and transmission <br />backbone <br />infrastructure <br />facilities <br />such <br />pipelines, while aggressively preparing in detail for customer connections and site retrofit. <br />Based on the experiences of other Bay area projects, customer coordination and site retrofit <br />requirements are typically underestimated, and actual recycled water use has fallen short of <br />odginal projections. <br />The proposed project could be implemented in multiple phases. Treatment, storage, pumping, <br />and pipeline transmission facilities to serve the Redwood Shores Area could be constructed in <br />fiscal year (FY) 2003/2004, and customer services and site retrofits could be constructed overa <br />three-year pedod between 2003 and 2006, so full supply benefits are obtained during the 2007 <br />irrigation season. The Greater Bayfront Area project phase may be driven by future developer <br />schedules, but it is tentatively planned that the 5-mile transmission line from SBSA to the <br />Whipple Avenue/Highway 101 Interchange could be in place by the year 2006, while the entire <br />Greater Bayfront Area could be served by 2009. In this scenario, the entire Alternative D Project <br />could be in place by 2009, which may be advantageous to the City as the Master Sales <br />Agreement between San Francisco and suburban porchasem will be renegotiated In 2009/2010 <br />(contract expiration). <br />Water Recycling Feasibility Study for Redwood Cib/ ' xil <br /> <br /> <br />