Laserfiche WebLink
REPOR <br /> I <br /> From the Managerj <br /> <br />October 14, 2002 <br /> <br />Subject <br />Building Codes Adoption <br /> <br />Recommendation 1. Introduce the building codes ordinance for first reading, on October i4, 2002. <br /> 2. Schedule a public headng on adoption of the building codes ordinance for October 28, 2002. <br /> 3. On October 28, 2002, adopt the building codes ordinance with necessary local amendments <br /> and the resolution on local conditions with the Finding of Facts, as recommended by the <br /> Board of Building Review. <br /> <br />Background <br />The Board of Building Review is appointed by the City Council to review the updating of the City's <br />building regulatory codes including suggested local amendments and to provide recommendations to <br />the City Council pertinent to the adoption of such codes. The California Building Standards <br />Commission, appointed by the Governor, selects model codes to form the basis of the California <br />Building Codes, processes State amendments, and establishes the effective date of the California <br />Building Codes, know as Title 24. Local iudsdictions are required to enforce Title 24 for many <br />occupancies and types of buildings. Local jurisdictions may adopt amendments to Title 24 based on <br />local geologic, topographic, or climatic conditions. The model codes are continually updated and then <br />republished every three years, which triggers this State and local code adoption process. In previous <br />years, this process was routine. <br /> <br />Unfortunately, the Building Standards Commission (BSC) has selected codes for the 2001 Califomia <br />Building Codes (effective date November 1, 2002) contrary to the recommendations of local <br />jurisdiction code Officials, members of the construction industry, and the BSC's own Code 2000 <br />Partnership Committees and Code Advisory Committees. The BSC selected the 1997 Uniform <br />Building Code instead of the 2000 International Building Code and Intemational Residential Code, a <br />Uniform Mechanical code which has not been significantly updated since 1994, a Uniform Fire Code <br />which is not coordinated with the 1997 Uniform Building Code, and the 1999 National Electrical Code <br />instead of the 2002 edition. The BSC also continues to restrict the use of plastic plumbing materials <br />to those found in the 1979 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code. <br /> <br />The Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO), an agency that rates Building Departments for purposes of <br />offering insurance discounts to.building owners where current codes are adopted and well enforced, <br />has announced that all Building Departments in Califomia will receive lower ratings as a result of the <br />BSC action. Industry members and Code Officials wish to use most updated codes which <br />incorporate latest safety features, developed in response to recent seismic activities, and newer <br />materials and methods of construction. <br /> <br />Code Officials in the Bay Area have worked previously to standardize codes, interpretations, and <br />procedures. In response to the 2001 California Code situation, Code Officials in the Peninsula, East <br />Bay, and Monterey Bay areas have developed and voted to support a uniform set of local <br />amendments which address the geologic and climatic conditions faced in this region. These twenty- <br />six (eighteen structural, one plumbing, and seven electrical) amendments will provide a greater level <br />of safety to our communities and lower construction costs when compared to the 2001 California <br />Building Codes. <br /> <br /> <br />