Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Findings <br /> <br />F. In fact, the shadow study submitted by the <br />appellant contains evidence of the non- <br />substantial shadowing that could be caused by a <br />new 8-story building adjacent to the appellant's <br />property. As the sun traverses across the sky, <br />the shadowing on appellant's property would <br />intensify and then dissipate. As the Appellant's <br />shadow study demonstrates, shadow would not <br />be cast on 601 Brewster Avenue for all daylight <br />h 0 u rs. <br />