My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-02-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-02-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2007 10:40:39 AM
Creation date
2/22/2007 3:04:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment
Date
2/26/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />TOBIN & TOBIN <br /> <br />Redwood City Council. <br />February 12,2007 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />(T)he comment is correct that the Draft Precise Plan-proposed <br />changes in building height allowances along the south side of <br />Brewster A venue may result in substantial shadow effects on the <br />property at 601 Brewster Avenue. <br /> <br />(See EIR, Section 19.01, p.3-34) (emphasis supplied). Moreover, it should be noted that the <br />Department is incapable of disputing the findings of Appellants' architect, Theodore Brown, that <br />the Precise Plan will result in substantial shadowing because the Department did not undertake <br />any study of the shadowing efIects likely to be caused by the Precise Plan. <br /> <br />2. City Policy Recognizes That Shadowing In Commercial Areas Does <br />Constitute A Significant Environmental Impact. <br /> <br />Prior interpretation by the Department of its "Redwood City Planning Division Urban <br />Design Guidelines" (the "Guidelines") has deemed negative shadowing impacts on commercial <br />to represent significant enviromnental impact. <br /> <br />In connection with the Department's rejection of the March 5, 2003 environmental <br />impact report for the Marina Shores Village Project, the Department deemed that natural sunlight <br />was an important consideration under the Guidelines. (See Marina Shores ErR, 5.2.4(b), p.5-8). <br />In doing so, the Department recognized that natural sunlight was to be encouraged in all projects, <br />and never limited the appticatjon of this policy to residential property: <br /> <br />Natural sunlight provisions shall be encouraged for all <br />pro,iects, particularly in the case of residential developments and <br />public and private outdoor areas. <br /> <br />Id. Specifically, in evaluating the impact of shadows on the Marina Shores Village Project, the <br />Department specifically included non-residential properties in its conclusion that there would be <br />a negative impact. "Impact 5-5: Shadow l.mpacts" reads as follows: <br /> <br />The project would cast substantial shadows on adjacent <br />residential, commercial, office, and public waterfronts during <br />part of the year.....Project buildings would cast shadows...over <br />Redwood Creek and offices of Seaport Center during the <br />afternoon. . . <br /> <br />98 <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.