Laserfiche WebLink
MIS Ruskin/Ira to INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br /> CITY OF REDWOOD CITY REPEALING ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 12 OF THE <br /> REDWOOD CITY MUNICIPAL CODE; ADDING ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 12 TO THE <br /> REDWOOD CITY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION; AND <br /> ADOPTING BY REFERENCE AND AS AMENDED THE "UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 2000 <br /> EDITION", AS PUBLISHED BY WESTERN FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION; <br /> and <br /> ADOPT RESOLUTION 14478 FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT, BECAUSE OF <br /> LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOGRAPHICAL AND TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS, THE <br /> PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND NECESSITY, REQUIRE CHANGES OR <br /> MODIFICATION TO CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 12 OF THE REDWOOD <br /> CITY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF "THE <br /> UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 2000 EDITION", AS MC.~!FIED AND MADE APPLICABLE TO <br /> THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY; '-;~ MINUTE ORDER 02-326 <br /> <br /> E. Appeal of a Zoning Ordinance Interpretation to Prohibit Sales of <br /> Professional Beauty Products at 2652 Broadway; <br /> <br /> City Manager Everett stated that staff had no report at this time, but that a major <br /> written response to a document submitted by the appellant on September 23 had <br /> been prepared by the City Attorney. <br /> <br /> M/S Hartnett/Ruskin to open the public hearing. The motion passed by a <br /> unanimous voice vote. <br /> <br /> David Blackwell stated that Innovations did not receive the City Attorney's <br /> response until October 30 and the staff report on October 31. He stated that the <br /> scope of the appeal is as was on September 23, the determination of the Zoning <br /> Administrator that the use is not retail use. Mr. Blackwell explained that the <br /> agenda states that the appeal pertains to the Zoning Administrator's decision that <br /> the business is not a permitted accessory use and that the appeal, in fact, has <br /> nothing to do with that point. In summary, he stated that his client came to the City <br /> with a use, a business license application was submitted in June, specifically, <br /> indicating that the business is a beauty supply sales to membership only. At no <br /> time was there any indication that this was a problem. He asked that whatever the <br /> decision is, that the parties be left with a mechanism to have reasonable, fair and <br /> good faith discussion to find a resolution, particularly, if it is a Conditional Use <br /> Permit. <br /> <br /> Vic Cochran stated that the business came with the best of intentions to open the <br /> store and service the community. He further stated that the intention is to find a <br /> way to resolve the problem and go forward~ <br /> <br /> Joe Hess stated that this is a retail operation servicing those in the business of <br /> hairdressing. <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 2002 <br />MINUTES PAGE 8 <br /> <br /> <br />