My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2001-09-24 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC Min 2001-09-24 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:40:29 PM
Creation date
2/12/2002 11:44:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/24/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Liedstrand stated that although zoning for the Bay Front <br />area exists, that it did not seem to be a plan that had credibility with the development <br />community. The outcome was that the City was reacting to individual development <br />proposals and not allowing for the relationships between the developments. He further stated <br />that staff recommended and Council approved that there be a brief Bayfront Study to view <br />this piece of the City as an integrated piece and develop some possible scenarios for <br />coordinated development of vacant and underutilized properties. The area is on the east of <br />Highway 101 from about Whipple Road through the Woodside interchange. <br /> <br />C.D. Director Liedstrand stated that this is the information gathering stage. Staffhas met <br />with representatives from both the Syufy Theatre and the Glenborough-Pauls Company <br />because they both have property in this area. The presentation is being made because staff <br />stated that the opportunity would be presented for Council to provide early input before staff <br />draws any conclusions. <br /> <br />Terry Bottomley, an urban designer, stated they are starting with questions, no decisions or <br />recommendations will be discussed. He defined a large area where there is a significant <br />potential for change. He proceeded to discuss the entire study area and stated that one issue <br />of the study is to get out in front of change so that the City can help shapen a vision of its <br />choosing. <br /> <br />Council Questions/Comments: <br />1. Public access and good connections to the water's edge creating a network should be <br /> included as part of the concept of any new development proposals. <br />2. A Redwood Creek connection should be included. <br />3. To not have only a specific use in the area, but keep some of the industry, keep thc <br /> area diverse and as it evolves incorporate the public infrastructure needed reserving <br /> land for such needs as schools, parks, etc. <br />4. Development/support of policy that provides no "back door" to water, public streets <br /> and parks. <br />5. Master plan to react to changes that occur such as in medium term where some land <br /> uses arc likely to change as land changes hands. <br />6. A buffer to be located between Highway 101 and any housing so that commercial use <br /> occurs along 101 with gradual residential extending outward. <br />7. Transportation link and dissimilar uses to work together toward continuity. <br />8. Consideration of regional transportation plans. <br /> <br />Public Comment: <br /> <br />Patricia Dixon requested a three-dimensional model be prepared and stated that boat storage <br />is a necessity and open space areas are needed. <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />MINUTES Book No. 59 <br />Page No. 15 <br /> <br />SEPTEMBER 24, 2001 <br /> PAGE 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.