Laserfiche WebLink
03/27/2007 <br />whether any special-status species occur in the affected area. Such surveys shall <br />be conducted by a qualified botanist following applicable guidelines of the <br />California Department of Fish and Game and/or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to <br />provide a conclusive determination on presence or absence. If any populations <br />with legal protective status are encountered, an appropriate mitigation plan shall <br />be developed in consultation with, and meeting the mitigation criteria of, the <br />jurisdictional agencies to provide for their protection (e.g., specific setbacks from <br />the creek, activity restrictions). <br />Finding: Implementation of this measure would ensure protection of <br />possible populations of special-status species in the Precise Plan area, mitigating <br />potential impacts to aless-than-significant level. <br />Impact 14-3: Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts. Under either the <br />Maximum or Moderate Intensity Precise Plan alternative, future Precise Plan- <br />facilitated development in the vicinity of Redwood Creek may affect potential <br />jurisdictional wetland habitat. This possibility represents a potentially significant <br />impact (see criteria 3 and 4 in subsection 14.3.1, "Significance Criteria," above). <br />Mitigation 14-3. or any future individual development projects in the <br />vicinity of Redwood Creek that involve modifications to potential wetlands and <br />other waters, coordinate with representatives of the California Department of Fish <br />and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as required by federal and <br />state law, to ensure that any required mitigation protocols and associated <br />individual project design modifications (e.g., specific setbacks from the creek, <br />activity restrictions) are incorporated into proposed improvement plans during the <br />initial stages of project review. <br />Finding: Implementation of this measure would ensure that potential <br />impacts on wetland resources are minimized and adequate replacement is <br />provided, mitigating this potential impact to aless-than-significant level. <br />VIII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS <br />A. Seismic Impacts <br />Impact 15-1: Ground Shaking. Under either the Maximum or Moderate Intensity <br />Precise Plan alternative, future development in accordance with the proposed Draft <br />Precise Plan would place new residences and businesses in a subregion that is <br />expected to experience severe earthquake-induced ground shaking during the useful <br />life of the project improvements. This ground movement could cause differential <br />settlement of any poorly consolidated soils and induce ground failure within alluvial soils <br />that may be prone to liquefaction. These possible responses to anticipated seismic <br />activity represent a potentially significant impact (see criteria 1, 3, and 4 in <br />subsection 15.3.1, "Significance Criteria," above). <br />Atty/Reso/Reso.1683 32 14769 <br />030707 Muff #613 <br />