Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />W -~ <br />iDETJTii~D IMPACT <br />RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE <br />implementation <br />Monitoring and <br />Timing <br />Signature <br />Date <br />~I ~ Enti Verification Enti R uirements <br />v N environment. This choice would result in a <br />p significant unavoidable impact under <br />~ current CEQA and City criteria for <br />(p "intersection im acts " <br />4mpact ¢B: Impact on BroadwaylJeffersan Mitigartion 9-8. Add an exclusive City; fair-share <br />imbursement Cify If and when improvements <br />City shall conduct <br />adopted <br />Avenue f~tersection--Moderate Intensity <br />During the PM <br />ise fan Alternative <br />P northbound left-turn lane on Broadway, and <br />convert the existing northbound shared left- re <br />from future , <br />annual traffic monitoring.Lat <br />. <br />rec <br />peak hoa4r?Moderate Intensity project traffic through right Zane into a shared <br />h <br />l <br />h individual <br />roject this intersection and <br />implement fair-share <br />would reduce the level of service to LOS F <br />d increase average delay by more than five anges <br />ese c <br />ane. T <br />through/right-kurn <br />would result in an acceptable LOS D under p <br />applicants. requirement when level of <br />OS <br />an <br />(5) seconds at the Broadway/Jefferson the Moderate Intensity alternative. <br /> <br />implementation of this measure would E <br />service reaches L <br />average delay of greater than <br />( <br />Avenue intersection. This change would <br />represent a significant impact. therefore reduce the impact to a less-than- 55 seconds). <br /> significant level. <br /> or <br /> Because this mitigation would result in the <br /> loss of sidewalk at comer bulb-outs, <br /> degrading the existing and future <br /> pedestrian environment and sidewalk <br /> dining opportunities, and would be <br /> inconsistent with the existing and proposed <br /> City policies giving priority to the Downtown <br /> pedestrian environment, the City may <br /> choose to avoid this intersection <br /> modification in the interest of protecting the <br /> pedestrian environment. This choice would <br /> result in a signid'rcarrt unavoidable impact <br /> under current CEQA and City criteria #or <br /> "Intersection Im acts." <br />Impact 9-9: Impact on Broadway! Mitigation S-9. The intersection of <br />Broadway/Middlefseld Road is currently a 4- <br />d <br />t City; fair-share <br />reimbursement City If and when improvements <br />adopted, City shall conduct <br />era <br />e <br />Middlefield Road Intersection-Mo <br />Intensity Precise Pian Alternative. During way stop controlled intersection. from future annual traffic monitoring at <br />this intersection and <br />the PM peak hour, the Moderate Intensity Signalizing the intersection (2-phase <br />conVol would result in LOS B operations <br />) individual <br />project implement fair-share <br />project traffic increment would reduce <br />under Moderate Intensity conditions, <br />applicants. re utrement when level of <br />operation to LOS E and increase average <br />thereby reducing this impact to a less-than- service reaches LOS E <br />delay by mare than five (5) seconds at the <br />ni~canf level. <br />si <br />Thi (average delay of greater than <br />g <br />s <br />Broadway/Middtefield Road intersection. 55 seconds). <br />change would represent a significant or <br />Because this signalization mitigation would: <br />impact. <br />(a) be less supportive of pedestrian <br />~ convenience and orientation than the <br />c existing 4-way stop due to delays to <br />~ -~ pedestrians waiting to cross during "walk" <br />~ ~ phases and higher vehicle speeds through <br />~ the intersection; (b) be inconsistent with <br />W c0 City intentions far this intersection to be <br />pedestrian-oriented given its location in the <br />Downtown core; and c be inconsistent <br /> <br />UaMy DocumentstDowrfov~.a Precise PIan1CC staff reportslCC 3. f2.doc13 12,07 ExhibrtstAttachment A mif moritorirg ch ecklist 655.doc <br />Page 12 <br />