Laserfiche WebLink
~ MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />PiED IMPACT <br />IDEN RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Ntonitoring and Timing Signature Date <br />~ Enti Verification Enti Re uirements <br />During ~t1re PM peak hour, project traffic would and prohibit southbound left turns. These individual this intersection and <br />reduce 1~e1 of service and increase average <br />delay byte (5) seconds or more at the changes would result in LOS E operations <br />during the PM peak hour, thereby reducing project <br />applicants. implement fair-share <br />requirement when level of <br />intersec n of Middlefield Road/Jefferson <br />~ the project's impact to a Tess-than- service reaches LOS E <br />{average delay of greater than <br />hich would already be operating at <br />Avenue significant level. 55 seconds). <br />LOS F. T11is effect would represent a or <br />signific~ impact. Mitigation 9.15{b). Implement Mitigation 9- <br /> 15(a) plus restripe northbound Middlefield <br />W <br />Road to two (2} left-turn lanes and one <br /> shared through/right-tum Pane. These <br /> changes would result in LOS E during the <br /> PM peak hour, thereby reducing the <br /> project's impact to aJess-than-significant <br /> level. <br /> or <br /> Mitigation 9-15(c). Restripe the <br /> southbound Middlefield Road approach to a <br /> shared left-through lane and one right-turn <br /> lane; restripe northbound Middlefield Road <br /> to one left-turn lane, one shared left <br /> through lane, and one right-turn lane; and <br /> implement a split phase signal operation for <br /> northbound and southbound Middlefield <br /> Road. These changes would result in LOS <br /> E operations during the PM peak hour, <br /> thereby reducing the project impacts to a <br /> less-than-signlt7cant level. <br /> or <br /> Because either the diversion of traffic to <br /> pedesUian corridors on Broadway and <br /> Middlefield resulting from prohibiting <br /> southbound {eft toms {Mitigations g-i5(a) <br /> and [bj?, or the impact on pedestrian signal <br /> sequencing with split phase signs{ <br /> operation {Mitigation 9-?5jcn, may <br /> potentially degrade the Downtown <br /> pedestrian environment and decrease <br /> pedestrian safety, comfort, and <br /> convenience; and be inconsistent with <br /> existing and proposed City policies giving <br /> priority to the Downtown pedestrian <br />~ environment; the City may choose to avoid <br />~ the three intersection modification options <br />~ ~ identified above in the interest of protecting <br />~ ~ the pedestrian environment. This choice <br />~ ~ wouid result in a significant unavoidable <br />W ~ impact under current CEQA and City <br /> criteria for "Intersection Impacts." <br />U:IMy DocumentslDowntown Precise PianlCC staff reportslCC 3. T2.doc13.?2.07 Exhrbifs~Attachment A mrt.monitoring checklist &55.doc <br />Page 15 <br />