Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />tDEN?~i~D IMPACT RELATED MITfGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature oate <br />~I ~ Enti Verification Enti Re uirements <br />v N determination on presence or absence. If <br />o any populations with legal protective status <br />~ are encountered, an appropriate mitigation <br />~p plan shall be developed in consultation <br />N with, and meeting the mitigation criteria of, <br />~ the jurisdictional agenaes to provide for <br />~ their protection (e.g., specific setbacks from <br />Oo the creek, activity restrictions). <br />W Implementation of this measure would <br /> ensure protection of possible populations of <br /> special-status species in the Precise Plan <br /> area, mitigating potential impacts to a less- <br /> fhan-si nlfrcant level. <br />Impact 14-3: Jurisdictional Wetland Mitigation 14-3. For any future individual Individual City; CDFG; Corps During project-specific <br />Empacts. Under either the Maximum or development projects In the viGnity of project environmental review <br />Moderate Intensity Prease Plan alternative, Redwood Creek that involve modifications applicants <br />future Precise Plan-facilitated development in to potential wetlands and other waters, <br />the vicinity of Redwood Creek may affect Coordinate with representatives of the <br />potential jurisdictional weriand habitat. This California Department of Fish and Game <br />possibility represents a pofentia!!y (CDFG) and the U.S. Army Corps of <br />signit-scant impact. Engineers (Corps}, as required by federal <br /> and skate law, to ensure that any required <br /> mitigation protocols and associated <br /> individual project design modifications (e.g., <br /> specific setbacks from the creek, activity <br /> restrictions} are incorporated Into proposed <br /> improvement plans during the initial stages <br /> of project review. implementation of this <br /> measure would ensure that potentl;af <br /> impacts on wetland resources are <br /> minimized and adequate replacement is <br /> provided, mitigating this potential irnpact to <br /> aless-than-si n/ticanf level. <br /> <br />GEOLOGYAND SOILS <br />Impact 15-1: Ground Shaking. Under Mitigation 15-1. At the City Building Individual City During project-specific <br />environmental review <br />either the Maximum or Moderate Intensity Official's discretion, future discretionary project <br />Precise Plan alternative, future development development projects proposed within the applicants <br />in accordance with the proposed Draft Precise Plan area shall be required to <br />Precise Plan would place new residences and undertake detailed, design-level <br />bu sses in a subregion that is expected to geotechnica(investigafions that include <br />expence severe earthquake-induced analysis of project site seismic stability, <br />groRpd~aking during the useful life of the liquefaction potential, and soil response <br />proJ#~tJmnprovements. This ground characteristics with respect to ground <br />it could cause differential settlement acceleration, in accordance with Special <br />mo <br />~ <br />of ~s y rly consolidated soils and induce Publication 112, "GuideBnes for Analyzing <br />" <br />ground allure within alluvial soils that may be and Mitigating Liquefaction in California, <br />Page 33 U:IMy DocumentslDowntown Precise Plan+CC staff ; eportslCC 3. f 2, doct3,12.07 ExhibrtslAftachment A mit.morrfori,^g check rst 655. doc <br />