Laserfiche WebLink
9A <br /> Page 49 <br /> a cut through t.r.a.ffic <br /> ■ traffic calming possibilities <br /> o child safety <br /> ■ nursery school dedicated drop off <br /> • Project alternatives permitied witlZin curreaZt zonu�g <br /> o Previou.sl.y approved project for mixed use oflice and residenfiial <br /> condo <br /> o Commercial-Multi-Tenant w/Ai.c:hor Bank <br /> o Fast Food with drive-through <br /> • Traffic Comparisons for al.ternatives auruzg PM peak hour trips <br /> ➢ Tlzere was an extended question a�id a.nswer period where cominunity mernbers <br /> asked sta.ff to further clarify information about information shared duri:ng the <br /> �resen:t�tion and about the�roject a.nd the process. <br /> > Coinmunity members participated in small group discussion on the foilowing <br /> questions: <br /> > SmaIl Grou�s ReporE�ut: <br /> 1. What could be the pubtic benefit nf the proposed Woodside Villas project? <br /> o Housing <br /> o Project Design <br /> o Environrnent <br /> o Property Values <br /> o Community Character <br /> 2. Whut are your concertts regardi�tg t1�e}�roposed project? <br /> 3. How cnuld your concerns be addressed/solved? <br /> 4. Is thexe an aTternate land use for the area that woicici better serve Redwood <br /> City? <br /> • Commercial <br /> • Mixed use <br /> o Previously approved <br /> o Larger mixed use option <br /> • (see Other Land Uses Permitted handout) <br /> 5. How would this alternate land use im�act Redwood Cit�? <br /> ■ Traffic <br /> • Property values <br /> ■ Tax base <br />