Laserfiche WebLink
9A <br /> Page 51 <br /> • More housing <br /> 2. What are your concerns regaPding the proposed project? <br /> • Too tall <br /> • Too dense <br /> • Property values will go down <br /> • Exacerl�ates traf£ic bottleneck <br /> • Traffic studv is deficient-only considered I-Iogan at WQadside <br /> � <br /> i.ntei�section,not Kentfield an.d Newcastle <br /> • Data collection for traffic study was done in the sununer ai 10:00 AM <br /> rr• <br /> wnen irarnc was iow <br /> • Privacy-the back of the bui.lding ov�r�ooks residezlts <br /> • Evergreen trees wili not solve the privacy concern <br /> • Hazmat was not fully�ddressed <br /> • ; 900a galloz�gas spill on site-need con.firmation that this hazard was <br /> `` removed <br /> • Cannot compare this site to Woodside Terrace <br /> • Concezn about planning on l-op of gas station <br /> o Laok at fihis prnject in isolati.on <br /> o Noi eonsidering commun,ity in the cul de sac and the density of <br /> building <br /> • What is the State's auth ority ori density? <br /> 3. How could your concerns be addressedlsolved? <br /> • Sxnailer project <br /> • Smaller density <br /> � Height down to 45 feet,. <br /> • Improve Iight to residents affected by slopi.ng the roof <br /> • Ingress/egress to Woodside instead af Horgan <br /> • I'ull EIR <br /> 4. Is there an alternate land use for the area that would better serve Redwood <br /> City? <br /> • Put in a City Park <br /> • 1 or 2 level Uuilding <br /> • B�ay or remove the gas station <br /> • Make it all on parcet and redesign the driveways <br /> 5. How would fihis alternate land use impact Redwood City <br /> GROLIP 3 <br /> 1. 4Vhat could be the pubtic benefit of the proposed Woodside Villas project? <br /> • No benefits identified <br />