My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-04-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-04-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2007 4:03:52 PM
Creation date
4/19/2007 2:00:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
4/23/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
394
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7A <br />Page 53 <br /> <br />(Attachment 4, notes of 2.6.07 meeting). Input received as a result of these outreach <br />efforts have been considered by staff and legal counsel to the City on this topic. <br /> <br />Environmental Review: <br />The amendment of an adopted sign ordinance is not specifically defined under the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a "project" triggering the need for <br />environmental review. CEQA Guidelines [Section 15061 (b)(3)] provide lead agencies with <br />a "common sense" exemption for such actions but the project does not fall within a <br />statutory or categorical exemption. This common sense exemption applies if an agency <br />can determine with "'certainty that the action will not produce significant environmental <br />effects. <br /> <br />The proposed changes to the sign ordinance primarily respond to changes in State and <br />Federal laws. The .proposed changes do not affect underlying sign standards in the <br />ordinance such as the number, placement, size, and maximum area calculations for signs, <br />nor do they change the requirements for obtaining permits for signs. The proposed <br />changes would not enable more or different types of signs to be constructed in Redwood <br />City. Therefore, the proposed changes to the sign ordinance are not expected to produce <br />significant adverse environmental effects and, using the "common sense" exemption, are <br />not subject to environmental review according to CEQA. <br /> <br />Alternatives <br />1. Approve the sign ordinance as proposed. <br />2. Modify the sign ordinance. <br />3. Refer the sign ordinance back to Planning staff for further study. <br /> <br />Fiscal Impact <br />If the proposed sign ordinance is adopted, then additional sign code enforcement <br />resources may be anticipated in 2011 and 2015 for active enforcement of non-conforming <br />signs, at Council's discretion. There is no other fiscal impact anticipated for the City. As in <br />the past, staff will continue to enforce non-conforming signs based upon complaints <br />received or applications for new sign permits. Planning and building application fees will <br />continue to contribute to the cost of design review and inspection of signs. <br /> <br /> <br />Peter Ingram <br />Community Deve opment Director <br /> <br /> <br />Ed Everett <br />City Manager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.