Laserfiche WebLink
I� � <br /> concludes that the consideration provided by the developer is not less than the fair re-use <br /> value of the Agency-owned parcel to be conveyed, at the use and with the covenants and <br /> conditions and development costs authorized by the DDA. Tim Kelly of Keyser Marston, <br /> who prepared the Summary Report, will be available to answer any questions you may • <br /> have: <br /> Action Three: Consideratfon of the Amended DDA <br /> Both the City and the Redevelopment Agency are signatories to this agreement and so <br /> both bodies must act on it. Separate resolutions have been prepared for the City and the <br /> Redevelopment Agency. <br /> History of the Project <br /> A chronology of events related to this project is listed in Attachment 4 to this report. This <br /> chronology starts in May 1997 and extends to December 2002. <br /> The DDA Approved in January 2001 <br /> in surnmary, what follows is the broad outline of the agreement reached in January 2001. <br /> This report refers to this document as the "prior DDA" to distinguish it from the Amended <br /> DDA now being presented to Council and the Redevelopment Board. <br /> • Block 1(the property bounded by Jefferson, Broadway, Middlefield and Winslow) <br /> was to contain approximately 80,000 square feet of ground floor retail space and a <br /> 20-screen multiplex on the second level, containing 4,200 seats. <br /> . Block 2(bounded by the railroad track, Winslow and Jefferson) would contain a <br /> 108,400 square foot office building and a parking garage with at least 1,000 spaces <br /> (approximateiy 800 net new spaces). <br /> The Developer was to fund $14 miilion to pay for the purchase of the privately held <br /> properties on Blocks 1 and 2, which included costs to acquire, relocate businesses, <br /> purchase fixtures and equipment, and pay for goodwill. <br /> The Agency was to convey the "Way-to-Go" parcel on Block 1 as part of the consideration <br /> for the Developer to fund $20 million to construct the 1,000 space public parking structure <br /> on City-owned land on Block 2. <br /> Also, as part of the consideration for the $20 millian, the Agency/City was to create a <br /> 32,000 square foot parcel on Block 2, including conveyance of approximately 15,000 <br /> square feet of the City owned land, for the Developer to construct the aforementioned <br /> office building. <br /> This approach to the project relied on the office component to subsidize the site acquisition <br /> for Block 1 and to pay for the structured parking. By mid-2001 the nationwide office market <br /> was in a slump, and in the Bay Area office buildings had become impossible to finance. It <br /> was clear that the agreement reached in the prior D�A would have to be renegotiated. <br /> The Redevelopment Agency, City and developer therefore worked to find an amended <br /> 3 <br />