My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-05-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2013 1:03:45 PM
Creation date
5/3/2007 3:09:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
5/7/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.4B <br /> Page 60 <br /> SIGN �RDINANCE MEETING NOTES <br /> ����a�-y s, aQO7 � <br /> 6:30-8:30pm <br /> City Council Chambers <br /> Note: these are rzot minutes and only caxtain tlze questions that were documented in tlie <br /> ftip chart. , <br /> Q: Castelti: When wi11 the time extension of signs begin? <br /> A: When the Ordina�xce is adopted. <br /> Q: Garcia: What if a building has cnore than one tenant? <br /> A: The property owner is responsible to come in for a sign program to po��tion out, as <br /> applicable, the allowable sign area basec�on lineal length of frontage of the p�operty (1.5 <br /> ti�nes the lineal fYOntage). All business (unless building identification sign scenarzo)get <br /> a mininaum of SD square feet for signage. <br /> Q: Raymundo: How does amortization relate to temporary signs? <br /> A: Te�np signs will be allowed for 90 days per calendar yecar without design review (if <br /> temporary sign stcays up longer than 90 days, they are treated as perrnanent signs or <br /> becorne illegal.) <br /> Q: Raymundo: Is there any thing to prevent appiicant to subrnit/keep a non conforming <br /> sign? <br /> A: Staff does their best to deter suclz applications at the early stages; some applicants jzcst <br /> want it their way. � <br /> Q: Andy Ray�nundo; Wuat about current signs that are in the process of review that do <br /> not meet the new ordinance? <br /> A: Applicants with pro�osals that do nat conform to tlze vrdinance means that they are <br /> asking foY an exception or if no findings can be made would be denied. <br /> Q: (Comment) The city should go after tenants with illegal signs not the property <br /> owners? <br /> A: Propert��owner is responsible for tencznts, but property owner an�tenants will be notified. <br /> �dditionally, sign contractors know what a viable sign is per tlie site. <br /> Q: Malony: Non-conforming pole sign needs refacing, is that ok? <br /> A: Refacing a sin.g is UK, if replacing with like, but woulcl require design review if a total <br /> change to aestl�etic vf sign face is involved. <br /> Q: Malony: What about previous for conforming signs? <br /> A: same answer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.