My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-05-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2013 1:03:45 PM
Creation date
5/3/2007 3:09:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
5/7/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.4B <br /> Page 62 <br /> Q: {unidentified speaker): Is the ARC using the draft ordinance now? <br /> A:�4RC is here tonight to inforrrt themselves,provide input on the draft ordinance anci hear <br /> what property owners and tenants have to say. <br /> Q: Howard: (Comment) City has a problem with sign enforcement process and <br /> p[anniug needs to work with code enforcement more to stop the placement of illegal <br /> signs. The enforcement regulations shauicf also be more specific. <br /> Q: Garcia: Is there a difference with interior or exterior signs? <br /> A: City does not regulate sig�zs three fePt within the building as well as illuminated signs 10- <br /> feet into the building. <br /> Q: Craighead: Wants clarification for number of signage per number of uuits on page <br /> 2b B.3? <br /> A: There will be less signage for more units <br /> Q: Craighead: What will happen to "A"frame signs on public land on Tuesdays <br /> according to page 47? <br /> A: The ordinc�nce says "may", not "shall" or "should". <br /> C.Rogers <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.