My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2007-03-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
CC Min 2007-03-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2011 2:23:48 PM
Creation date
5/9/2007 11:08:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
3/26/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B. Solid Waste Collections Rate Increase <br />Director of Finance and Financial Planning Ponty gave background on the topic. <br />Ponty explained the Proposition 218 process that provides if over 50% written <br />protests from the ratepayers that the public entity may not precede with the rate <br />increase. By the deadline of 5:00 p.m. on April 26, 30 written protests had been <br />received. Two more were received at the public hearing for a total of 32. <br />Council Members asked questions. <br />M/S Foust/Howard to extend the meeting to 11:45 p.m. The motion passed by a <br />unanimous voice vote. <br />Mayor Pierce opened the public hearing. <br />Public Comment: <br />Merrily Robinson, 50 -year Redwood City resident, protested the garbage bill for <br />the smallest 20- gallon can. She stated that she is currently recycling paper, cans, <br />bottles and other items while shopping wisely to eliminate waste. She stated that <br />this particular category should not be the ones to pay the increase and that the <br />large capacity users should pay the increase. She stated that her second issue <br />relates to the SBSA $11.6M that was given to the 10 cities over five years for <br />overcharge of chipping fees. Her question is where Redwood City's money goes <br />and why we don't use it to hire people for waste reduction, construction and <br />demolition or hiring a person to plan and implement total recycling at facilities <br />such as the Cinema complex. <br />Karen Borelis protested the 10.75% increase stating that the cost should not be <br />passed on year after year to residents and that nonprofit employers will also be <br />impacted. <br />Karen Jacoubowsky stated that she is disturbed at 6:15 a.m. by the recycling truck <br />and cited noise until approximately 6:42 p.m. She stated that the service does not <br />merit an increase (submitted pictures). <br />Claire Felong stated that she is not opposed so much to rate increases but that <br />there should be more opportunities to recycle more items. She is a member of <br />Cool Cities and stated that the technology is available but the education is <br />needed. She requested the City put more effort into complete recycling so that <br />costs can be kept down. <br />Nadine Taylor, 32 -year resident of Redwood City, stated that at this time that a <br />rate increase is being considered it is an excellent time for the City to promote <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/ MARCH 26, 2007 <br />PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING MINUTES PAGE 10 <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 61 <br />Page No. 361 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.