Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6.1G <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES Page 2 <br />The Council could elect not to approve the five-year agreement and continue with one- <br />year agreements, thereby offering no guarantee on the maximum annual hourly rate <br />increase. This is not an acceptable alternative to Burlingame, our largest customer in <br />terms of hours purchased. Without an agreement in place, Burlingame could seek <br />information technology services elsewhere. This would decrease our revenues, <br />requiring us to reduce staff or to find one or more clients to purchase an equivalent <br />number of hours. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />There are no new costs associated with implementing the above recommendation. The <br />agreement will generate e~en $2.2 million and $2.4 million in revenues over the life <br />of the contract. / / ~ I'~;? <br />. ..-l/J / ~\ <br /> <br />~~~--==-=-_ ( I <br />"~>-~,.-. Brian Pontt <br />Financial Services Director <br /> <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />1. Agreement for Information Technology support between the City of Redwood City <br />and the City of Burlingame <br />2. Amendment No.3 to agreement for Information Technology support between the <br />City of Redwood City and the City of Burlingame <br /> <br />RELATED DOCUMENTS IN CITY CLERK'S OFFICE <br />1. Agreement for Information Technology support between the City of Redwood City <br />and the City of Burlingame <br />2. Amendment NO.1 to agreement for Information Technology support between the <br />City of Redwood City and the City of Burlingame <br />3. Amendment NO.2 to agreement for Information Technology support between the <br />City of Redwood City and the City of Burlingame <br />