Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7A <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Prop. 1 B - $2 Billion for Local Streets and Roads - Adopted Assembly Version <br /> <br />The Joint Senate/Assembly Budget Conference Committee moved and passed the Assembly <br />version: $600 million for cities and counties for local streets and roads from Prop. 1 B for FY 2007- <br />OB. Cities would receive $300 million of tllis appropriation. This is potentially subject to change, <br />however, based on legislative leadership meetings expected to occur in the near future. <br /> <br />The League of California Cities is continuing to advocate for the full $1 billion for cities. <br /> <br />Transit Spillover - Adopted Compromise <br /> <br />The Joint Senate/Assembly Budget Conference Committee provided $551 mlllion of the transit <br />funds (including spillover revenue for General Fund relief) in the following manner: <br /> <br />. $339 million for debt service <br />. $129 million for Developmental Services - Regional Center Transportation <br />. $83 million for Prop. 42 loan payoff <br /> <br />Approximateiy $800 million will go to transit for operating costs. This represents a one-year <br />approach with respect to transit spillover revenues, without addressing the multi-year approach <br />as was previously proposed by the Assembly and would have affected the current Prop. 42 <br />formula. As with Prop. 1 B funding, legislative leadership meetings might affect whether or not a <br />multi-year approach for transit funding is pursued in the budget. <br /> <br />High-Speed Rail Authority - Adopted Compromise <br /> <br />The Joint Senate/Assembly Budget Conference Committee provided $55.5 million for the High- <br />Speed Rail Authority, which is slightly more than previously proposed by either house in the past <br />weeks. This revenue will come from two sources: $40 million from the Public Transportation <br />Account and $15.5 million from Prop. 116. <br /> <br />What's Next <br /> <br />Although the committee took action on several transportation items of importance to cities, <br />negotiations will continue with legislative leaders and Gov. Schwarzenegger until a final budget <br />package emerges. These discussions may impact appropriations levels of the infrastructure <br />bond package, in particular, the Prop. 1 B local street and road funds. <br /> <br />The League will continue to provide updates in future issues of Priority Focus as these <br />discussions continue. <br /> <br />'ACA 8' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />Assembly Member De La Torre was joined by League Executive Director Chris McKenzie and <br />California Mexican American Chamber of Commerce President Frank Moreno in supporting the <br />legislation at the hearing. <br /> <br />If it passes through the Legislature, ACA 8 would be placed on the 2008 ballot. If approved by <br />voters, the constitutional amendment would prohibit the use of eminent domain to take an owner- <br />occupied home to convey to another private party and new restrictions on the taking of small <br />business properties for conveyance to private parties. <br /> <br />Specifically, ACA 8 would do the following: <br /> <br />. Prohibit the state or local governments from using eminent domain to acquire an owner. <br />occupied home (including townhomes and condos) for transfer to another private party <br /> <br />3 <br />