Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Serious Concerns <br /> <br />· Report to the Council from the City Manager 7 A, page 6, <br /> <br />paragraph 1, last 2 sentences: <br /> <br />· The appellants identified this discrepancy when they noted that <br />although the traffic study includes reference to the Stanford project, <br />they could find no reference to it in the pertinent technical <br />attachments. This production error was identified after the June 19, <br />2007 hearing. <br /> <br />· Same reference, paragraph 3 <br /> <br />· I nclusion of the correct Attachments does not trigger the need for a <br />Supplemental of Subsequent EIR under Section 15162 of the CEQA <br />Guidelines because the information does not result in the <br />identification of new environmental impacts nor increase the <br />severity of identified environmental impacts. The Addendum <br />provides the correct technical data supporting the traffic study, but <br />does not result in any new conclusions about the project impacts or <br />mitigation measures. <br />