My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-08-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-08-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2007 5:37:52 PM
Creation date
8/9/2007 3:32:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Closed
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/13/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
317
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />June 26, 2007 <br /> <br />~; I'e ~iv. I~ " '," ,- r:-, I <br />r1 ) c Lr, j~ !l 'd; j~ In <br />:...;1 - -.,,~., I <br />< I. <br />'ll JUN 2 6 2007 /lJ I <br />! CITY OF REDWOOD CITY. I <br />G!TY CLERf~ <br /> <br />City of Redwood City <br />1017 Middlefield Road <br />Redwood City, California 94063 <br /> <br />To Whom It May Concern: <br /> <br />We, the Redwood Village Neighborhood Association and its members, appeal the <br />decision made by the Planning Commission to certify the FEIR for the Redwood City <br />Costco Wholesale Project and Fueling Station Project at 2300 Middlefield Road, <br />Redwood City, California. We also appeal the decisions made by the Zoning <br />Administrator to issue permits for both the warehouse expansion and the fueling center. <br />In addition to this written appeal, we respectfully request that a hearing with the City <br />Council be granted. We also respectfully request the privilege to include any new <br />information that we may obtain, which would be submitted 10 days before a scheduled <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Reasons for our appeal primarily fall in the categories of process, project description and <br />studies, alternative analysis, social justice. Examples of issues we have in each category <br />are provided below. <br /> <br />Process: <br /> <br />Public Notice indicated that the proceedings of the Planning Commission and the Zoning l <br />Administrator of June 19,2007 were Hearings. It is our understanding that hearings <br />allow for public input. However, the Zoning Administrator did not allow for public <br />comment. As a result; we were unable to provide input with respect to the project's use <br />permits, decision-making process, and questions posed by the ZA to the Planning <br />Department and / or Costco. We were clearly observers; not participants. The ZA was <br />accordingly unable to take into account public input at this Hearing that may have <br />affected his decisions. <br /> <br />The Zoning Administrator himself was the sole decision maker on the specifications of <br />the project and use permits without the input of the Planning Commission (PC). We also <br />concerned that the Planning Commission only certified the FElR and not the project. Is <br />there the requirement that the PC certify or approve the proposed project? <br /> <br />We believe many of the good questions posed by the Planning Commission and the <br />Zoning Administer to Costeo were inadequate. We believe these questions should be <br />revisited by the PC and ZA. <br /> <br />7A <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />0) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.