Laserfiche WebLink
7A <br /> Page 57 <br /> poifution and gfare. He could not find energy conservation, page 61, 4.12.2.24 section in <br /> the EIR. City staff is working on develaping a definition of sustainability, he would <br /> ancourage that if the City adopts some sustainability definitions or requirements that <br /> thev ir�c��ic�P as m�ny as possible #hat are reasonabls. <br /> Commissioner Gee also noted that the repaving of Alameda is schedule for about now. <br /> He would like to know if that can wait until Sequoia is done. <br /> Jon Lynch, City Engineer, stated that the overlay of Alameda can't be postponed <br /> because it is a federally funded and granted item. <br /> ��;,�� <br /> �ommissioner Gee asked if the pubfic can be notifie�y that�''�hP c�vPrl�yin� is � <br /> requirement. <br /> € ;, : <br /> Commissioner Seybert stated that Sequoia Hospi al�as done � great job warking with <br /> the pub(ic. (n the FEIR, regarding the commen `�-• ar=.e not gov���mental agencies, it <br /> is apparent that the neighbors have learne � to live wi#h Sequot� Hospita! in their <br /> neighborhood and #hat the greatest im ��s will .be during the �o€�str�t�tion. A <br /> suggestion is that there be a phone �bet' for neighbors to call if th�y have any <br /> concerns and a regular community newsletterto_;t�eighbprs';, a:� <br /> Commissioner Seybert stated tl���t,stafF needs to look at the Circle Raad neighborhood <br /> ar� cut-through traffic to protect t�►oS��areas. <br /> Commissioner Codding asked if the first�re��rnmendaban, pa�t b is for the City Council <br /> or the Pfanning Commission. '` t <br /> �� <br /> Assistant City Attc��'Ar�nda rep[ied th�f it is#he Planning Commission. <br /> ,: <br /> M/S (Coddir.����e�bert} rec4mmendation to certify by motion the Sequoia Hospital Final <br /> Environmenta! Iri3��t Re�ort (�mal EIR) �ncluding the Amendment that incorporates <br /> , _ • ,. .,, ;...,hi...,�,.,.,+.,+,,. .. + c� <br /> i 2viS�0�ia iv ii ic vi 8��i� "� +1�3��'w�3Qrfa�101'�i��i8�'�'SIS, Sl.t,�''i�2�.f tv �i�iN�ci i�ci�iauvf i v� ��'i'� ��P <br /> .;.. ; <br /> mit��a�r�;;,�e�sures a�id based on�"the�ndings below: <br /> a�,=The FinaT ���has be�r� �amp{eted in compliance with the California Environmental <br /> �C�uafity Act (CEQAj, : ,.� <br /> „� b� The Finai EIR h�s been p�sented to the cfecision-making body of the City, and fhe <br /> d'e����n-making bot��.:i�as reviewed and cansidered the information contained in fhe <br /> Final El�_;before recos�iinending approval of the project; and <br /> c} The F��al_EIR refl��`s the City's independent judgment and analysis. <br /> d} A Draft�tfit��at��o�Al{onitaring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared far <br /> the project an�:��lr e incorpora#ed in the conditions of approval to avoid or substantially <br /> lessen significai�#�`environmental effects. <br /> Motion Passe�i 5-0 <br /> Commissioner Gee stated that some previous motions had a section regarding records <br /> iocation, is that required under fhis motion. <br /> Mr. Aranda replied that it is not required, but we can note that the documents wilE be at <br /> the Planning Department and the contact would be Maureen Riordan. <br /> Ms. Riordan stated that all documents are also an the City's website. <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br />