AgdaPkt 2007-09-10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6.2A Page 1 REPt)RT To the Honorabie N�a�or and City Cauncil Fram the C" Mana er Sepfember 10, 2�Q7 Svg,�ecr Fina[ Acceptance— Red Morton Community Park Sy�thetic Turf Fieid Insfa(fation Projec# RECOMMENDATION Accept, by matior�, the Red Morton Community Park Synthetic Turf Field Installa#ion F�oject, authorize fi�al vaiu� cf ccntract, and a�thorize the release of bcnds and retention according to the terms of the Agreemerrt. BACKGROUND On August 7, 2006, Counai approved the Contract Documents, and authorized the awrard of Contract for the Red Marton Community Park Synthetic Turf Field InstaNation Project to interstate Grading and Paving, Inc. This project replaced natural turf with synthetic turf on the G�iffinlBechet, Mitchell, and McGarvey sportFietcls which are tocated at the Red Morton Community Center complex. This project resul#ed from water conservatEon measures identified and rec�mmended by the Communi#y Task Force on Recycled Water in their report dated March 3, 2004 ta Counci{. The RecyGed Wa#er Project ailocated $5 miilion (later increased to $6.6 million due to cast esealation) ta fund the canversion af six sefected sportfieids to synthetic turF to reduce the demand an potable wa#er supplies. The instaNation af Red Nlorton is followed by a separate projed fo insta![ s}mfihetic turf an sportfields at Mar�in, Sandpiper, and Nawes parks. Fundin� from the Recycled W�ter Project for the turf conversian projects is supplemented by Proposition Na. 40 Parkland Block Grant funds and fhe City's Capitai tmprovemerrt Program, which funds the non-water conservation related components of#he#�rf conversion projects. The project was awarded fvr #he base bid of �3,957,280.05. Change arders (ten), totaling $119;3�38_98(3°�n}, were issued and finai project cost is $4,076,fi69.03. Change orders resulfed from urtfioreseeable site conditions, such as sail stabili�ation af native mud #a prevent future heaving and settlement, and quan#ity adjustmen#s of materials to complete the project. AL7ERNATIVE3 Caunci! may chaose nof to accept the project which would be contrary to priar Councii action. FlSCAL IMPACT Funding for the major costs of this project was appropria#ed from the Water Bond Pro�ects Fund, Recycied Water System De�elopment in Oc#aber, 20�6 and suppfemented by $542,61 fl.QQ from Proposition No. 40 Parkiand Block Grant funds, and Capita! Improvement Project funds. Upon compietion o# this project, $2.7 msllion remains avaifat�le from the Water Bond Pro�ecfs Fund for the remaining three spo�eld conversion projecks now undenivay.