Laserfiche WebLink
7B <br /> Page 7 <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> There are many alternatives available to the Counci! from establishing the 3 acres/�,aOQ <br /> resident active parkland standard but not moving forward with ihe in-iieu fee at all, to <br /> changing the percentage of the park fee to be charged or otherwise modifying the <br /> recommendations of the F'inance Committee. <br /> FESCAL IMPACT <br /> Funding receiveci would be placed in a special Capitaf Irnprovement Program (CIP)fund <br /> for purchase of land and/or creatian of additional park capacity. This fee daes not <br /> prevent Council from using other CIP monies to �urchase park la�ds. <br /> � <br /> _ ; <br /> Corinne Centeno Ed Evereft <br /> Parks, Recreation &Community City Manager <br /> Services Directar <br /> ATTACMMENTS <br /> 1. Nexus Study, Table 1, New Residential Development Projections <br /> 2. Public Outreach Chronology <br /> 3. Quimby Act lmplementation Ordinance <br /> 4. Parks Impact Fee Ordinance <br /> 5. Resolution To Amend the General Plan Establishing the Active Community Parkland <br /> Standard <br /> 6. Resolution Adoptirtg Park Needs Assessment and impact Fee Project List <br /> RELATED DOCUMENTS !N C1TY CLERK'S OFFICE <br /> Park Needs Assessment <br />