My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-05-06 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-05-06 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 3:58:50 PM
Creation date
5/2/2019 3:54:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/6/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
612
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Map13g is still one of the three maps under consideration for approval. Map 13g is not valid. It does not <br />comply with California state criteria for defining districts. Contiguity is a requirement. Redwood Shores and <br />Bair Island are not contiguous. <br />Contiguity <br />Contiguity is a requirement. There is no physical connection between Redwood Shores and Bair Island. They <br />are physically separated by San Carlos and water. Bair Island is contiguous to the rest of Redwood <br />City. Redwood Shores and Bair Island do not "touch." Lacking this basic criteria, districting based upon <br />combining Redwood Shores and Bair Island is not allowed. <br />Traditional districting criteria <br />The districting approach by the RWC Council does not seem to follow traditional criteria. While the latest <br />maps now comply with two majority -Latino districts and equal population, they don't fully comply with other <br />traditional criteria. See attachment: Traditional Districting Principles. This document describes the principles <br />typical of choosing districts based upon objective criteria. One important criteria is compactness. Redwood <br />Shores is a perfect example of compactness. <br />The matrix of maps provided by demographer and the RWC Council shows Map 13g passes requirements for <br />equal population, two Latino majority districts, and some neighborhood considerations. But, it lacks other <br />required or preferred districting criteria. For your convenience, I have recast the matrix analysis for <br />Map 13g. The criteria is changed to show typical and California state districting principles- and requirements - <br />based criteria. See attached: Map 13g matrix - - Traditional and California state criteria. <br />California state districting requirements <br />The below are excerpted phrases from California state districting requirements. They are in order of <br />importance. <br />1. requires that districts be contiguous <br />2. to extentosp sible preserve geographic integrity — communities of interest <br />3. to extent practicable - compactness <br />4. may not consider candidate residency and districts cannot be drawn to favor or discriminate against <br />a candidate <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.