Laserfiche WebLink
REDWOOD CITY <br />management and engineering and economic feasibility. The EPA RAA Guide <br />provides an example of three differing perspectives for defining reasonable <br />assurance (USEPA 2017): <br />• Regulator Perspective - Reasonable assurance is a demonstration <br />that the implementation of a GI Plan will result in sufficient pollutant <br />reductions over time to address TMDL WI -As or other targets <br />specified in the MRP. <br />• Stakeholder Perspective - Reasonable assurance is a demonstration <br />that specific management practices are identified with sufficient <br />detail, and implemented on a schedule to ensure that necessary <br />improvements in water quality will occur. <br />• Permittee Perspective - Reasonable assurance is based on a detailed <br />analysis of the TMDL WI -As and associated MRP targets themselves, <br />and a determination of the feasibility of those requirements. The <br />RAA may also assist in evaluating the financial resources needed to <br />meet pollutant reductions based on schedules identified in the MRP. <br />Appendices C and D provide full documentation of the technical approaches <br />and results of the SMCWPPP RAA, which are consistent with the <br />recommendations of the EPA RAA Guide and Bay Area RAA Guidance. <br />2.3 Preliminary Identification of Opportunities for GI <br />Projects <br />To support the RAA and GI Plans, C/CAG has initiated a number of planning <br />efforts that identify opportunities for GI implementation. The following is a <br />summary of those efforts: <br />• Low Impact Development (LID) for New Development and <br />Redevelopment — The MRP includes a Provision (C.3) for the <br />integration of LID within new development and redevelopment. As <br />LID techniques are implemented as new development and <br />redevelopment occurs throughout Redwood City, the benefits of <br />such practices in terms of reducing urban runoff flows and <br />associated pollutant loads can be considered as part of the pollutant <br />load reductions attributed to implementation of GI. C/CAG worked <br />with San Mateo County Permittees to compile information on LID <br />practices that have been implemented within new development and <br />redevelopment since water year 2003 (baseline year for the TMDL). <br />C/CAG also performed an analysis to project the number of acres of <br />future new development and redevelopment to be addressed <br />through Provision C.3 by 2040. The RAA considers existing LID <br />practices and projections of LID in future new development and <br />RWC GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN <br />GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN <br />Figure 2. SRP Prioritized Green <br />Street Opportunities. <br />11 JUNE 2019 <br />ATTY/RESO.0075/CC RESO APPROVING THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN — EXHIBIT A RESO. NO. 15780 <br />REV: 06-20-19 PR MUFF NO. 802 <br />