My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res19 15780
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
Res19 15780
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2019 12:42:36 PM
Creation date
6/26/2019 12:42:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/24/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REDWOOD CITY <br />GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN <br />Figure 7. Scenario 1: Map of GI capacities within each subwatershed of Redwood City <br />(sediment target, with regional identified project). <br />As can be seen in the above results, the cost -optimization favored <br />implementation of different combinations of GI projects within each <br />subwatershed. These combinations were based on: (1) number and type of GI <br />project opportunities identified within each subwatershed, and (2) cost- <br />effectiveness given various characteristics associated with GI control measure <br />efficiency (typically governed by infiltration rates), higher sediment (or PCBs) <br />generation in upstream areas, etc. During implementation, it is almost certain <br />that the actual implementation of GI will not follow the RAA output exactly; <br />however, the recipe provides "management metrics' by subwatershed <br />(described below) to guide the adaptive management process. Dimensions <br />and location of GI projects will vary based on on -the -ground feasibility and <br />site-specific constraints. GI performance varies based on factors like the <br />physical properties of the facility and upstream drainage area managed. For <br />these reasons, it is not recommended that GI capacity serve as the focus for <br />stormwater improvement goals for the GI Plan. <br />The RAA recommends management metrics for the GI Plan that are based on <br />metrics that can be easily measured and tracked throughout implementation. <br />At the left side of the table in Table 2 are columns under the header <br />"Management Metrics for GI," which include performance metrics for "% Load <br />Reduction PCBs (Annual)," "Annual Volume Managed (acre -ft)," and <br />"Impervious Area Treated (acres)." The "% Load Reduction PCBs (Annual)" and <br />"Annual Volume Managed (acre -ft)" metrics are based on annualized results <br />represented in the RAA modeling system that are directly comparable to TMDL <br />WLAs. The "% Load Reduction PCBs (Annual)" provides a relative comparison <br />of the load reduction to be achieved within each subwatershed. The "Annual <br />Volume Managed (acre -ft)" shows the acre-feet of water captured and <br />infiltrated and/or treated within each subwatershed, resulting in a total annual <br />volume of 15.3 acre-feet of stormwater managed in Redwood City for an <br />average year. This 15.3 acre-feet of stormwater managed could serve as the <br />primary metric to be tracked for GI implementation. In other words, <br />stormwater volume managed is being used as a unifying metric to evaluate GI <br />effectiveness. 'Impervious Area Treated (acres)"is an additional metric <br />suggested by the MRP for implementation tracking. As a result of adaptive <br />management, the implementation plan may change over time and alternative <br />RWC GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN <br />22 JUNE 2019 <br />ATTY/RESO.0075/CC RESO APPROVING THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN — EXHIBIT A RESO. NO.15780 <br />REV: 06-20-19 PR MUFF NO. 802 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.