Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 9 of 32 <br />restrictions on this type of housing. While the Planning Commission approved the resolution, it asked staff <br />to study the following prior to the City Council hearing: <br />1. Implement a sliding scale to allow proportional increases in square footage for second story ADUs <br />above garages. <br />2. Allow additional square footage for second story ADUs above detached garages through a public <br />hearing or additional findings. <br />3. Explore the City of Belmont's ADU regulations and consider adopting code amendments to allow <br />varying height maximums in association with roof form and/or distance from property lines, <br />require fagade compatibility with the main home, and require the architectural style to be <br />compatible with the main home. <br />4. Lot coverage exemption for detached one-story ADUs. <br />5. Allow ADUs to be exempt from the City's half -story height requirements. <br />Sliding Scale <br />A sliding scale could allow a proportional increase in floor area above a detached garage when tied to <br />another independent variable, for example, lot size, distance from property lines, or height of structure. <br />Establishing a connection between ADU square footage and its impact to neighboring properties can be <br />inexact. A sliding scale would be difficult to implement without further study and analysis of any <br />established practices in other jurisdictions. <br />Square Footage Exemption, Public Hearings and Findings <br />A public hearing process and additional findings to justify an increase of square footage above a maximum <br />amount over a detached garage would be possible. The findings would have to be adjudicated by the <br />Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission. A public hearing process would require additional <br />administrative resources and may not be the most efficient use of these functions; however, it would <br />allow for more intensive public notice and review. Establishing findings based on subjective criteria could <br />result in additional appeals. <br />Study the City of Belmont's ADU regulations <br />The City of Belmont allows detached two-story ADU height maximums based on setbacks and roof form. <br />ADUs are allowed a height of 17ft. for a flat roof, 22 ft. for a pitched roof when set back less than 5 ft. <br />from the property line, and 20 ft. and 24 ft. respectively for structures that meet the setback requirements <br />for the main home. All structures above 18 ft. tall are required to comply with residential design <br />guidelines. <br />Additionally, Belmont's ADU regulations require the ADU to match the exterior fagade materials and <br />architectural style of the new home. Redwood City's ADU ordinance already includes architectural <br />standards (Section 37.3.F) which require the ADU to be architecturally compatible with the architectural <br />style and exterior paint and materials of the main home. The Planning Commission's recommended <br />height restrictions could affect ADU architectural styles and may not allow for the ADU to match the main <br />home. The requirement for matching fagade materials and architectural styles could be addressed <br />through the upcoming residential design guideline effort. <br />10] <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.ore <br />242 <br />