My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res96 12819
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Res96 12819
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:38:19 PM
Creation date
12/16/2002 10:22:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/15/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(c) Radar data from the San Francisco International Airport PASSUR system <br /> for runway 30 operations during fair weather show that the majority of downwind <br /> operations take place in a band 3,000 to 5,500 feet abeam the runway. Runway 12 <br /> operations under inclement weather generally take place in a band of from 2,500 <br /> to 5,500 feet abeam the runway, and at altitudes of from 500 to 700 feet. Under <br /> these conditions, the location and height of the building would have no effect <br /> whatsoever on the location of the traffic pattern or noise abatement procedures. <br /> <br />3.10.17 P_O.I~IialI,,II~: The existence of the 10-story building on the Project site could <br /> b-. re-_i:v::.-~.ble for a'...:.zra-a. ~_cc,.'&nts dmSng e_,v.~gomcy $1tnatJnn. S, $11t~h as ~ <br /> engine-out situation. <br /> <br /> F_Lnllillgt: The City hereby makes finding (1). <br /> <br /> Facts in Support of Findings: <br /> <br /> (a) The first rule for maintaining control of an aimraft in an engine-out situation is <br /> to maintain lateral and directional control. The 10-story building is located <br /> approximately 5,200 feet fi'om the start of takeoff roll and 1,800 feet to the right of the <br /> extended centerline for Runway 30. The building would not represent a hazard unless <br /> the pilot had lost all lateral and directional control, in which case the aircraft would <br /> likely invert and crash anyway. <br /> <br /> (b) Up to a 1 O-degree fight mm under engine-out conditions would allow the <br /> aircraft in distress several options preferable to overflying the Project site. These <br /> alternatives include: <br /> <br /> 1. To land straight ahead in the area designated "Clear Zone" on Exhibit <br /> 19 of the Airport Study (the purpose for which the Clear Zone was designed); <br /> <br /> 2. To maintain straight and level flight on the runway heading into the 50- <br /> foot height restriction corridor, which was developed specifically for this <br /> purpose; or <br /> <br /> 3. To enter the 50-foot height restriction corridor on a heading of up to ten <br /> degrees off the runway heading, and continue the flight unobstructed. <br /> <br /> Any of these alternatives would be preferable to making a turn in excess of 20 degrees <br /> in the direction of the Project site. <br /> <br /> (c) As noted in testimony by Arthur J. Negrette, President of the Flight Safety <br /> Institute and airport consultant, "in a perfect world, all of the space to the north and to <br /> the south of the airport would be either paved surfaces or open space surfaces. So that <br /> if any airplane ever experienced problems, there would be unlimited options to where <br /> to land the aircraft, or at least there wouldn't be a congested area. Unfortunately, we <br /> -33- <br /> EAFNDGCC.DOC <br /> 7/11/96 9:56 AM <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.