My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-08-26 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-08-26 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 10:00:32 AM
Creation date
8/23/2019 8:26:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
8/26/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
8/23/2019 8:28 AM
Modified:
8/23/2019 8:28 AM
Text:
http://www.redwoodcity.org/
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
464
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 7 of 85 <br />prohibited for homes that meet (or already exceed) the FAR limit, even if they pose little impact to <br />neighborhood compatibility. <br />Of all the hard -cap options evaluated, the Planning Commission's recommendation provides the most <br />flexibility. In many cases, smaller lots would not be able to meet the maximum home size allowances due <br />to constraints with lot width, setbacks, lot coverage, and second story setbacks, however allowing a house <br />of up to 2,500 sq. ft. on all lots would provide the ability to achieve reasonable size homes for otherwise <br />constrained lots. For a larger lot, namely those greater than around 6,300 sq. ft., application of the 0.40 <br />ratio would result in homes greater than 2,500 square feet and would help provide flexibility to develop <br />a larger home on a larger lot where it may be appropriate. Table 2 above shows the allowable home size <br />on certain lots. <br />Nonconforming Homes - The Planning Commission's recommendation also creates the least amount of <br />non -conforming homes due to exceeding FAR. With a hard -cap of 0.40 FAR (Option 1), the existing square <br />footage data indicates that approximately 2,083 or 17% of all Redwood City homes would become <br />nonconforming. With the Planning Commission recommendation, the greater of .40 FAR or 2,500 sq. ft., <br />the amount of nonconforming homes is 731 or 6%. A home that is non -conforming due to exceeding FAR <br />would not be allowed to add any square footage no matter how small, though the property owner could <br />remodel the existing home. This is a significant change as there are homes today that are considered non- <br />conforming due to setbacks that do not meet the current regulations, however these homes still have the <br />ability to expand provided the new addition meets the required setbacks. Table 5 below shows the <br />number of homes that would be non -conforming due to FAR by neighborhood. <br />Table 5 - NUMBER OF NON -CONFORMING HOMES WITH RECOMMENDED FAR <br />(LISTED FROM HIGHEST PERCENTAGE PER NEIGHBORHOOD TO LOWEST) <br />Redwood Shores <br />2,244 <br />414 <br />18.5% <br />Mt. Carmel <br />1,030 <br />62 <br />6% <br />Edgewood Park <br />558 <br />28 <br />5% <br />Canyon <br />410 <br />19 <br />4.6% <br />Redwood Oaks <br />904 <br />34 <br />3.8% <br />Farm Hill <br />1,906 <br />69 <br />3.6% <br />Eagle Hill <br />778 <br />22 <br />2.8% <br />Woodside Plaza <br />1,430 <br />39 <br />2.7% <br />Roosevelt <br />1,118 <br />21 <br />1.9% <br />Stambaugh -Heller <br />188 <br />3 <br />1.6% <br />Friendly Acres <br />655 <br />6 <br />1% <br />Central <br />785 <br />8 <br />1% <br />Redwood Village <br />280 <br />2 <br />0.7% <br />Palm <br />362 <br />2 <br />0.5% <br />Centennial <br />458 <br />2 <br />0.4% <br />ALL NEIGHBORHOODS <br />12,106 <br />731 <br />6% <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />283 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.