My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-08-26 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-08-26 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 10:00:32 AM
Creation date
8/23/2019 8:26:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
8/26/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
464
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.F. - Page 6 of 13 <br />EXHIBIT "A" <br />SCOPE OF SERVICES AND FEE <br />Task 1.1 Review/Assess and Summarize Comments ' <br />Consultant will review, code and categorize the public Summary of Public Comments <br />comments received on the Draft EIR, including those on the Draft EIR and Approach to <br />made by the public and City Council during the public Responses Memo (PDF) <br />hearing on the Draft EIR. Consultant will recommend <br />appropriate response approaches for each comment (or category of comments), and identify those that <br />warrant input or direction from the City. <br />The City has received approximately 300 distinct comments that warrant responses, in addition to <br />comments received from the City and Project sponsor on the initial draft of this proposed scope of work. <br />The Consultant estimates it will take a total of 296 labor hours to prepare the Response to Comments I <br />Final EIR, approximately 82 hours of which are preparation of initial draft responses to comments. This <br />assumes Consultant will update and reuse limited draft responses prepared for the 2016 Responses to <br />Comments where appropriate. Specifically, based on our review of comments to date, previous draft <br />responses that may apply pertain to bird impacts and bird -safe design; jobsthousing imbalance; and <br />some aspects of sea level rise and air quality toxic air contaminant effects. <br />Task 1.2 Final EIR Structure <br />Consistent with our discussions with City staff to date, the proposed structure of the Response to <br />Comments I Final EIR is as follows and is described in more detail in subsequent tasks (noted below <br />in parentheses): <br />• Chapter 1 - Introduction: Overview of CEQA Context and Background <br />• Chapter 2 -Revised Project (Task 2.2) <br />2.1- Description of Revised Project <br />2.2- Analysis and Comparison of the Revised Project to the Draft EIR Project <br />• Chapter 3: "50-50" No Project/ Existing Zoning Alternative (Task 2.3) <br />3.1- Description of "50-50" No Project I Existing ZoningAltemative <br />3.2- Analysis and Comparison of the "50-50" No Project I Existing Zoning <br />Alternative to the Draft EIR Project <br />• Chapter 4: Text Revisions to the Draft EIR Summary of Impacts and Mitigations (Task2.4) <br />• Chapter 5: Master Responses (within Tasks 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4) <br />• Chapter 6: Individual Response (within Task 2.4) <br />6.1- Comments Received at the City Council Hearing <br />6.2- Comments Received in Writing <br />• Chapter 7: Additional Text Revisions to the Draft EIR (within Task2.4) <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />REV: 08-06-19 PR <br />ATTYIAGR.Amend No. 21ESA Harbor View Project <br />75 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.