Laserfiche WebLink
the City's file for the applications and the Project, and all adopted City planning <br />documents relating to the Project and the property including the City's General <br />Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, and other applicable City laws and <br />regulations, have together served as an adequate and appropriate evidentiary <br />basis for the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution. <br />Section 2. The Planning Commission finds that, based on substantial <br />evidence in the administrative record, the project is Categorically Exempt <br />pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section <br />15332 (Class 32) for Infill Development Projects. Specifically, the project <br />complies with each required condition of the exemption as: <br />a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan and zoning <br />designations; <br />b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no <br />more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; <br />c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or <br />threatened species; <br />d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating <br />to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality; and <br />e) The site can be readily served by all required utilities and public services. <br />In addition, none of the exceptions under CEQA Guidelines section <br />15300.2 apply. Specifically, <br />1) As a stand-alone project, there is no cumulative impact of successive <br />projects of the same type in the same place, over time, <br />2) There is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant <br />effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances because no <br />unusual circumstances exist on the project site or surrounding area, <br />3) There is no potential for an impact to scenic resources within a highway <br />officially designated as a state scenic highway because there is not a <br />designated highway in the vicinity of the Project, <br />4) The Project is not included on any list compiled pursuant to Section <br />65962.5 of the Government Code because site remediation has been <br />complete and Case Closure Letter issued by San Mateo County on March <br />6, 2012, and <br />5) There will be no substantial adverse change in the significance of a <br />historical resource because the site does not contain any historic <br />resources. <br />Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(e), the documents and other <br />materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council <br />has based its decision are located in and may be obtained from, the Office of the <br />City Clerk at 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City California. The City Clerk is <br />the custodian of records for all matters before the City. <br />Page 2 of 16 <br />ATN/RES0.0091/PC RESO 31 CENTER STREET <br />REV: 09-12-19 PR <br />