|
6.A. - Page 110 of 114
<br />been if the applicable Discount Rate applied to calculate them had been 1 percentage point lower
<br />in the amount set forth beside its name for that year in Appendix A.
<br />Response: The City agrees with this finding as pertaining to the City of Redwood City data.
<br />F6. Each City's CAFR for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2015, June 30, 2016, June 30, 2017, and June
<br />30, 2018 reported general fund total expenditures for each of FY 2014-15, FY 2015-16, FY 2016-17,
<br />and FY 2017-18 in the amounts set forth beside its name for that year in Appendix A.
<br />Response: The City agrees with this finding as pertaining to the City of Redwood City data.
<br />F7. In each of the fiscal years ending June 30, 2015, June 30, 2016, June 30, 2017, and June 30, 2018,
<br />each City's combined contribution payments to CaIPERS on the City's pension plans represented
<br />the percentage of that City's general fund total expenditures for that year set forth beside its name
<br />for that year in Appendix A in the column entitled "Contribution Payments as % of General Fund
<br />Total Expenditures."
<br />Response: The City agrees with this finding as pertaining to the City of Redwood City data.
<br />F8. In each of the fiscal years ending June 30, 2015, June 30, 2016, June 30, 2017, and June 30, 2018,
<br />each City's combined contribution payments to CalPERS on the City's pension plans represented
<br />the percentage of that City's combined covered payroll for the City's pension plans in the amount
<br />set forth beside its name for that year in Appendix A in the column entitled "Contribution Rate
<br />(i.e., Contribution Payments as % of Covered Payroll)."
<br />Response: The City agrees with this finding as pertaining to the City of Redwood City data.
<br />F9. Each of Colma, Daly City, Foster City, Hillsborough, and Redwood City includes in its annual, or bi-
<br />annual budgets published on its public website, projections showing the annual dollar amount of its
<br />projected pension contribution costs for the next five or more years. None of the other Cities do so.
<br />Response: The City agrees with this finding as pertaining to the City of Redwood City data.
<br />F10. Neither Atherton, Brisbane, nor Portola Valley have published, anywhere on their public website
<br />or their agenda packages for City Council meetings, projections showing the annual dollar amount
<br />of their projected contribution costs for the next five or more years.
<br />Response: This finding does not apply to the City of Redwood City data.
<br />F11. The only way to find projections showing the annual dollar amount of the following Cities' projected
<br />pension contribution costs for the next five or more years on their public websites is by manually
<br />searching through agenda packages for their City Council meetings: Belmont, Burlingame, East Palo
<br />Alto, Half Moon Bay, Menlo Park, Millbrae, Pacifica, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Mateo, South San
<br />Francisco, and Woodside.
<br />Response: This finding does not apply to the City of Redwood City.
<br />F12. Each of Colma, Daly City, Hillsborough, Menlo Park, Pacifica, Redwood City, San Mateo, South San
<br />114
<br />
|