Laserfiche WebLink
6.A. - Page 10 of 114 <br />Due in large part to unduly optimistic assumptions Ca1PERS made in the past about long-term <br />rates of return it could achieve, almost all of the Cities have large Unfunded Liabilities, with an <br />average Funded Percentage of just 70.5 percent in FY 2016-17, well below the 80 percent "at <br />risk" threshold. 10 Further, average annual pension payments by the Cities were projected to <br />increase by 92.6 percent between FY 2017-18 and FY 2024-25. According to some financial <br />experts, Ca1PERS' assumptions about ROI appear to remain optimistic, implying that future <br />pension liabilities may be even larger than currently projected." <br />The 2017-18 Grand Jury recommended that Cities develop long-term financial plans to address <br />their pension liabilities and publish readily -accessible information on their websites about future <br />pension costs and their long-term financial plans. The Grand Jury did not recommend what <br />specific actions the Cities should take to plan for meeting their pension obligations but did outline <br />a number of alternatives. Broadly, these fall into three categories: (1) reducing future pension <br />payments to Ca1PERS by paying down the Unfunded Liabilities early, thereby saving interest <br />costs; (2) managing future pension payments to Ca1PERS by methods such as contributions to a <br />reserve, negotiating cost-sharing arrangements with employees, and keeping employee salary <br />increases within the rate assumed by Ca1PERS; and (3) adapting to future pension payment <br />increases by reducing municipal operating costs and/or seeking revenue enhancements. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Updated Pension Data from Cities' FY 2017-18 Financial Reports <br />Appendix A to this report is an updated version of the Appendix A attached to the prior report. The <br />updated Appendix A incorporates pension cost data from each City for FY 2017-18, the most <br />recent year for which annual financial reports (usually referred to in this report as "CAFRs" for <br />"Comprehensive Annual Financial Report" )12 from the Cities are available. This updated <br />Appendix A provides data from each of the 20 Cities for the four-year period from FY 2014-15 <br />through FY 2017-18. <br />Data for FY 2017-18 in Appendix A show continued increases in (i) the Cities' pension <br />contribution costs, averaging an increase of 15.2 percent over FY 2016-17, and (ii) the amount of <br />the Cities' Unfunded Liabilities, averaging an increase of 14.2 percent over FY 2016-17. These <br />increases are generally consistent with projections described in the prior report. <br />9 "Funded Percentage" is defined on page 3 of the prior report. <br />1° See discussion in prior report of "at risk" threshold (page 16). <br />11 See discussion of expert concerns that Ca1PERS' return on investment projections may be too optimistic at pages 8- <br />9 of the prior report. <br />12 The term "CAFR" is used in this report to refer, not only to "Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports," but also to <br />"Basic Financial Statements" and "Annual Financial Reports." The audited annual financial reports for the Towns of <br />Atherton, Colma, Portola Valley, and Woodside are referred to by them as either "Basic Financial Statements" or <br />"Annual Financial Reports." <br />2018-2019 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury <br />14 <br />