|
6.A. - Page 80 of 114
<br />for each of FY 2014-15, FY 2015-16, FY 2016-17 and FY 2017-18 in the amounts set
<br />forth beside its name for that year in Appendix A.
<br />F7. In each of the fiscal years ending June 30, 2015, June 30, 2016, June 30, 2017 and June
<br />30, 2018, each City's combined contribution payments to Ca1PERS on the City's pension
<br />plans represented the percentage of that City's general fund total expenditures for that
<br />year set forth beside its name for that year in Appendix A in the column entitled
<br />"Contribution Payments as % of General Fund Total Expenditures."
<br />F8. In each of the fiscal years ending June 30, 2015, June 30, 2016, June 30, 2017 and June
<br />30, 2018, each City's combined contribution payments to Ca1PERS on the City's pension
<br />plans represented the percentage of that City's combined covered payroll for the City's
<br />pension plans in the amount set forth beside its name for that year in Appendix A in the
<br />column entitled "Contribution Rate (i.e., Contribution Payments as % of Covered
<br />Payroll)."
<br />Projections of Future City Pension Costs
<br />F9. Each of Colma, Daly City, Foster City, Hillsborough, and Redwood City includes in its
<br />annual, or bi-annual budgets published on its public website, projections showing the
<br />annual dollar amount of its projected pension contribution costs for the next five or more
<br />years. None of the other Cities do so.
<br />F10. Neither Atherton, Brisbane, nor Portola Valley have published, anywhere on their public
<br />website or their agenda packages for city council meetings, projections showing the
<br />annual dollar amount of their projected pension contribution costs for the next five or
<br />more years.
<br />F11. The only way to find projections showing the annual dollar amount of the following
<br />Cities' projected pension contribution costs for the next five or more years on their public
<br />websites is by manually searching through agenda packages for their city council
<br />meetings: Belmont, Burlingame, East Palo Alto, Half Moon Bay, Menlo Park, Millbrae,
<br />Pacifica, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Mateo, South San Francisco and Woodside.
<br />Long -Term Financial Forecasts
<br />F12. Each of Colma, Daly City, Hillsborough, Menlo Park, Pacifica, Redwood City, San
<br />Mateo, South San Francisco and Woodside has a general fund operating budget forecast
<br />covering a ten-year period. Of those nine, only Colma, Hillsborough, Menlo Park,
<br />Redwood City, San Mateo, and Woodside make those forecasts accessible to the public
<br />in their most recent annual or bi-annual budgets or annual financial reports published on
<br />their public websites.
<br />2018-2019 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 73
<br />84
<br />
|