My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res11 15086
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res11 15086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:45:33 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:45:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
1/24/2011
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
01/24/2011 <br /> Exhibit B <br /> existing laws, regulations and policies, including the California Building <br /> Codes and the City's development review procedures. However, until future <br /> development projects are proposed, assessment of potential seismic hazards <br /> and required mitigation would be speculative. In addition, the DPP does not <br /> in and of itself approve new construction. This potential impact is therefore <br /> considered less than significant. <br /> 17 Cumulative Impacts <br /> Impact 17a. Cumulative Land Use and Planning Impacts. New <br /> development under the DPP, together with the other reasonably foreseeable <br /> development in Redwood City included in the cumulative development <br /> assumptions, would result in an estimated total of approximately 20,227 new <br /> housing units and approximately 7,823,959 million square feet of new non- <br /> residential development in the City's sphere of influence. This cumulative <br /> development would result in continued infill and an increased density and <br /> intensity of development throughout the city. Due to the Cargill Saltworks <br /> project land use compatibility impacts with the nearby Port and conflicts with <br /> the Bay Plan, associated cumulative impacts related to land use <br /> compatibility impacts and conflicts with land use plans may be potentially <br /> significant. However, the DPP would preserve and enhance compatibility <br /> among land uses within the DPP area and with adjacent land uses surrounding <br /> the DPP area; would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or <br /> regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental <br /> effect; and therefore would not contribute significantly to cumulative land use <br /> impacts and would not be cumulatively considerable. Cumulative impacts <br /> related to land use and planning would be less than significant. <br /> Impact 17b. Aesthetics and Visual Resources. The DPP would not obstruct <br /> scenic vistas and would have an overall beneficial effect on the visual <br /> character of the Downtown and the city as a whole over existing conditions <br /> and existing zoning. Therefore, the contribution of the DPP to significant <br /> cumulative aesthetic and visual resource impacts would not be cumulatively <br /> considerable and thus would be less than significant. <br /> Impact 17c. Cumulative Police, Fire and Emergency Medical Facilities <br /> Impacts. The projected cumulative development totals would result in a <br /> cumulative increase in calls for police, fire and emergency medical service <br /> and a need for additional staffing and equipment, and possibly new or <br /> expanded facilities, to continue to meet the City's response time goals. No <br /> facilities expansions or new facilities have been identified at this time. The <br /> construction of new or expanded facilities could cause environmental impacts; <br /> however, the location, timing, nature, extent and severity of any potential <br /> environmental impacts are too speculative to predict or evaluate at this time. <br /> U: \Resolutions\2011\Reso 15086 Exhibit B.doc 15 <br /> 012011 Reso. # 15086 <br /> Muff #601 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.