Laserfiche WebLink
01/24/2011 <br /> Exhibit B <br /> of the DPP relating to increased traffic described above, as set forth in the <br /> Statement of Overriding Considerations below. <br /> Impact 9 -3: Project Impact on Main Street/Woodside Road Westbound <br /> Ramps Intersection. Under Project Conditions during the PM peak hour, this <br /> intersection would continue to operate at unacceptable LOS F. The additional <br /> project traffic would cause the critical delay to increase by more than five (5) <br /> seconds. <br /> a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed <br /> on pages 9 -38 to 9 -48 of the DEIR. <br /> b) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City, the <br /> City Council finds that: <br /> (i) Mitigation Measures. Mitigation of this project impact could be <br /> achieved by Mitigation Measure 9 -3 (p. 9 -50 of the DEIR) with the signalization <br /> of this intersection. However, any improvements within the Woodside Road right - <br /> of -way (SR 84) are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of Caltrans. While <br /> the City believes this measure can and should be adopted by Caltrans, because its <br /> implementation is outside of the City's jurisdiction, it is deemed infeasible and <br /> this impact is considered to be significant and unavoidable. <br /> (ii) Remaining Impacts. Because there are no feasible mitigation <br /> measures available to mitigate the significant impact identified above, this impact <br /> is considered significant and unavoidable. <br /> (iii) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, social, <br /> economic and other benefits of the DPP override the significant adverse impacts <br /> of the DPP relating to increased traffic described above, as set forth in the <br /> Statement of Overriding Considerations below. <br /> Impact 9 -4: Project Impact on Middlefield Road/Woodside Road <br /> Intersection. Under Project Conditions during the PM peak hour, this intersection <br /> would deteriorate to an unacceptable level of service (LOS E) from an acceptable <br /> LOS 0 under Background Conditions. <br /> a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed <br /> on pages 9 -38 to 9 -48 of the DEIR. <br /> b) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City, the <br /> City Council finds that: <br /> (i) Mitigation Measures. Mitigation of this project impact could be <br /> achieved by Mitigation Measure 9 -4 (p. 9 -50 of the DEIR) with the addition of a <br /> second eastbound left turn land on Woodside Road. <br /> U:\Resolutions\2011\Reso 15086 Exhibit B.doc 25 <br /> 012011 Reso. # 15086 <br /> Muff #601 <br />