Res11 15141 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

osizzizoi i ciry has determined not to participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program or if the City has not yet made such a determination; and WHEREAS, on July 18, 2011, the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association and others filed a petition on behalf of cities, counties and redevelopment agencies asking the California Supreme Court to overturn AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27; and WHEREAS, on August 11, 2011, the California Supreme Court agreed to hear the petition and issued a partial stay of enforcement of AB 1 X 26 and AB 1 X 27; and WHEREAS, the partial stay of enforcement has raised questions as to the actions the City and Agency can still take pursuant to AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27; and WHEREAS, the City intends to but will not have adopted by September 1, 2011,an ordinance agreeing to comply with the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program if a final determination is made upholding AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27; and WHEREAS, should the City determine to comply with the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program and adopt an ordinance in compliance with AB1X 27 (if upheld), there will no longer be a need for the City to serve as Successor Agency of the Agency; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF REDWOOD CITY AND THE BOARD OF THE REDWOOD CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Successor Aqencv. The City of Redwood City agrees to be the Successor Agency if it elects not to enter into the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program. ., . . ATTY/RES02153/RDA SUCCESOR AGENCY RESO. # 15141 081511 MUFF # 401 2