Laserfiche WebLink
11/19/2012 <br /> ATTACHMENT A <br /> D. Ex-parte Communications. Constituents have a reasonable expectation that they may <br /> engage their elected officials on matters of community concern such as land use matters <br /> which are often controversial. However, interested persons also have a right to know <br /> what a Council Member considers as evidence in making certain decisions and may feel <br /> that the proceeding was not fair when a public official has ex parte communications <br /> (communications that occur outside of a public hearing) on a matter that is before or <br /> likely to come before the City Council. <br /> The City Council wishes to balance its commitment to transparency in government and <br /> its obligation to provide a fair process. Accordingly, the following is suggested as best <br /> practices: <br /> 1. Legislative decisions. Legislative decisions relate to the City Council's law- <br /> making and policy functions, such as ordinances, zoning, and general plan <br /> amendments. The City Council may discuss pending legislative matters <br /> freely with its constituents and the public and no disclosure of those <br /> contacts is necessary. <br /> 2. Adiudicative decisions or quasi-iudicial decisions. Adjudicative or quasi- <br /> judicial decisions relate to evaluations and judgments where the City <br /> Council is charged with applying legal standards to a factual situation, such <br /> as discretionary land use entitlements. Accordingly, the procedure <br /> employed must be fair and as well as accord interested parties with a <br /> meaningful opportunity to prepare and be heard. Interested parties should <br /> keep in mind that ex parte contacts with Council Members may give rise to <br /> the perception that the process was not fair if Council Members have <br /> information that other interested parties do not have or ex parte contacts <br /> may give rise to a perception that the Council Member is biased in favor of <br /> or against a particular party. While Council Members may meet with <br /> constituents to discuss pending adjudicative decisions, it is recommended <br /> that the Council Member make a complete disclosure of the contact, as <br /> follows: <br /> i. Where information of a specific nature is gathered by a member of <br /> the City Council through contacts outside the record and the <br /> information is not already on the record,the member shall disclose <br /> the contact and its substance on the record prior to the <br /> commencement of the hearing to which such contact relates. <br /> ii. When a matter involves a mixture of adjudicatory and fegislative <br /> decisions, ex parte contacts and communications shall be disclosed. <br /> 3. Appeals. Once an appeal is filed, the City Council prefers to limit ex parte <br /> communications and rely on the record as presented during the hearing. In <br /> this case, the City Council Members should discourage any ex parte <br /> communications and may wish to avoid gathering or receiving information <br /> outside the noticed public meeting but to the extent such communication <br /> occurs,they should disclose this information. <br /> ATTY/DOCS-POLOCIES/10-23-12 PT REV CITY COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE CLEAN.DOC <br /> REV:10-24-12 PT <br /> Page 8 of 11 <br /> RESO.#15231 <br /> MUFF#205 <br />