My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15248
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:48:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:48:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/11/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAKING CEQA FINDINGS FOR ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA, ADDING ARTICLE III ("REUSABLE BAGS") TO CHAPTER 13 (ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CODE) OF THE REDWOOD CITY MUNICIPAL CODE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
03/11/2013 <br /> 1. OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION <br /> These findings are made with respect to the "Project Approvals" (as defined <br /> below) for the Reusable Bag Ordinances (the "Project") to be adopted by the <br /> County of San Mateo (the "County") and various municipalities in the County and <br /> in Santa Clara Counfy and state the findings of the Board of Supervisors (the <br /> "Board") of the County relating to the potential environmental effects of the <br /> Project. <br /> The following findings are required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br /> ("CEQA"), Public Resources Code Sections 21081, 21081.5 and 21081.6, and <br /> Title 14, California Code of Regulations (the "CEQA Guidelines") Sections 15091 <br /> through 15093, for the Project. <br /> Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section <br /> 15091, no public agency shall approve or carry out a project where an Environ- <br /> mental Impact Report ("EIR") has been cerfified, which identifies one or more <br /> significant impacts on the environment that would occur if the Project is approved <br /> or carried out, unless the public agency makes one or more findings for each of <br /> those significant impacts, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale of <br /> each finding. The possible findings, which must be supported by substantial <br /> evidence in the record, are: <br /> a. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the <br /> Project that mitigate or avoid the significant impact on the environment. <br /> b. Changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of <br /> another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by <br /> that other agency. <br /> c. Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations make <br /> infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the <br /> EIR. <br /> For those significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to below a level of signifi- <br /> cance, the public agency is required to find that the specific overriding economic, <br /> legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant <br /> impacts on the environment. As discussed in detail below, the Project would not <br /> result in any significant unavoidable effects; all potential impacts identified by Draft <br /> Program EIR and Final Program EIR are either beneficial or less than significanf <br /> such that no mitigation measures are required. <br /> The Proiect EIR determines that no siqnificant impacts on the environment would <br /> occur if the Project is approved or carried out and onlv identifies impacts that <br /> would be considered less than siqnificant without need for mitiaation and impacts <br /> that would be considered beneficial to the environment. Findings for each of the <br /> 2 <br /> RESO.#1524MUFF#304 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.